To this essential question we have a good answer in the Bible in the Greek Book of Sirach. In its chapter 13 we may read:

“What part hath the rich with the poor? The wild ass is the lion’s prey in the desert: so also the poor are nurture for the rich.”

Due to this danger a reasonable man shall be suspicious of propositions of “partnership” between rich Western Europe and considered as “poor”, eastern part of this Continent. I can give a good example how representatives of “democratic regimes” of rich countries mistreat representatives of “poor” ones.

In November of 2010, one month before presidential elections in Belarus, to Minsk arrived ministers of foreign affairs of Germany and Poland, Guido Westerwelle and Radek Sikorski. They visited President Aleksandr Lukashenko and officially demanded that he, in the name of the European Union, make the most possibly transparent elections. But when Lukashenko won these elections, the European Union, believing in information invented by anti-Belarus Polish television “Belsat”, began to consider these elections terribly falsified – according to Belsat, Lukashenka has not received nearly 80 percent, but only 30-40 percent of votes.

After these “fraudulent” elections, Radek Sikorski, speaking at the main channel of Polish television, told the public that he, during the November visit to Minsk, together with Westerwelle, made to Lukashenko a very democratic proposal: in case Lukashenka arranges the victory of one of his competitors in elections, he will retire from his post as a rich man and live in security as a citizen of Europe. But in case he refuses to do it, he shall expect the fate of Miloshevic [Milosevic] in Jugoslavia [Yugoslavia], of Nadzhbullah [Najibullah] in Afghanistan, or Saddam Hussein in Iraq.

It is evident that Sikorski behaved like a stupid guy and not like a serious politician, disclosing, at Polish TV, such an “honest proposition” made to Lukashenko. But I suspect a similar proposition was sent, around the same time, to Libyan “dictator” Muammar Qaddafi – the still socialist Libya, like Belarus in Europe, is also an object of pressure of so-called “world community”, demanding its full “partnership” in the process of globalization. But why should leaders of these relatively small countries have to abandon their posts, and why is the “international community” not permitting presidents of countries of the “civilized world” to remain at their posts for more than only two terms?

In December of 2002 in Vienna, Austria, I participated in a Round Table under the title “The Impact of Regional Groupings On International Relations”, organized by “Jamahir Society for Culture and Philosophy”. At this meeting was posed the same question as the one we have at present at our conference in Minsk in May 2011: “Is it possible to organize regional autonomous economic bondings?”

For the Round Table at Vienna I prepared a whole lecture titled « WESTERN CONCEPTS OF SOCIAL ORDER: from “European Corporation” of A. Comte (1842) to “Global Tumor” of F.A. von Hayek (1939)» [1]. I presented in it a resume of views of the author of “Bible” of contemporary globalism, the Austro-English economist and philosopher F. A. von Hayek. This “guru” of neoliberalism, already in an article published for the first time in 1939[2], has explained why no “sovereign” regional grouping can be permitted, and why presidents of states can remain at their posts only for two terms. I quote Hayek:

“Economic boundaries create regional common interests, where interpersonal bonds are particularly strong. This causes that all conflicts of interests are conflicts between these same groups of men, and not conflicts between groups constantly changing their composition. (...) It is thus evident that in the interest of the whole, taken in a larger way, these groupings shall not be durable, and in particular they shall not overlap with the territorial division, identifying themselves in a durable way with inhabitants of a given region.(…For this reason) the liquidation of the sovereignty of states is the necessary and logical goal of the liberal program”.

But what shall people do for whom reasoning (and acting) in terms of “national interest” will be – or already is – forbidden? The “denationalized” and “de-socialized” goal of liberal life is evident, and this goal is realized with enthusiasm by leading Transnational Corporations. Already 30 years ago I wrote[3] what I repeat at present: “The only collective goal of human activity, admitted in the Global Empire, should be the “giving happiness to the majority,” acquisition of private property, especially of these mobile, shining items, which are subjects of a competitive mass production and distribution.”

In this manner adult people, behaving like children afflicted with an ever more widespread illness called “autism”, make themselves slaves of these shining products of technical development. And from money, which helps everyone to become owner of these idols of happiness, radiates nearly “godlike” strength, which strength effectively destroys all “totalitarian”, socialist and national principles of collective life.

This Power of Money changes people into isolated “atoms” circulating everywhere in search of a “job”. But money are only unanimated objects, which already 3000 years ago were well known to Mediterranean cultures. And from these remote times it is known that behind the domination of money are hiding bankers. The Greek philosopher Aristotle demanded to hate these ultra-sedentary men, for “they are getting rich while doing nothing”.

From the point of view of Greek philosophy, “the liberal project of economic partnership” simply represents the project of interception of all political power and of all mind control of capable-to-read-newspapers populace, by World’s oligarchy – and in particular by the oligarchy which is descending from the religious mafia of Old Covenant. This results from the fact that we know only one antique scripture which permits usury as a weapon for the enslavement of “pagan nations”. This “virus” of creeping-like-a-cancer financial gangsterism is hidden inside V Book of Moses, chapt. 23, 20.

So we have since already 3000s years the creeping aggression of “chosen people” against the population of the whole planet. This population, as demands it in the Bible, shall “bless the god of Israel” and shall work as slaves for the priesthood of this antique god of money and private property, “for the nation and the kingdom that will not serve you will perish, and these nations will be utterly laid waste” (Isaiah chapter 60, 10-12). This “virus” of destruction of all capable-to-reason humanity carry with himself in his Holy Black Book each orthodox pop, each catholic priest and each protestant pastor of our “blessed by god” Judeo-Christian civilization. And without neutralization of this virus of “monetarization” of mankind, we all will change ourselves into slaves of chosen (by money) people, wittily described as M-KGB – “Mammonist Koalition of Global Businessmen”.

During the Round Table at Vienna 8.5 years ago, I stressed that local, regional economic partnerships not accepted by the Center of Globalization of the World (CGW) will be forbidden. And we see this today in Libya: Qaddafi, who has money from “corruption by petrol consumption” of European citizens using automobiles for more than three decades, realized – with relative success – a regional economic and cultural collaboration of African countries. This work was useful for the health of citizens of this “damned by the god of white gangsters” continent.

But Qaddafi was perceived as MAN OF EVIL by elite of M-KGB, playing the role of Adon Olam (Eternal Lord). This ‘god’ of gangsters and usurers ordered the murder of the maverick Libyan leader 30 years ago; and on 15 June 1980, NATO fighters attempted to shoot down Qaddafi’s plane when he was going to visit Poland. But the NATO special forces mistakenly shot down an Itavi? Boeing with 81 passengers, over the Tyrrhenian Sea.

The contemporary M-KGB (with centers in Washington and London, Paris and Moscow) plans to substitute the Qaddafi-organized “African partnership” with “Mediterranean regional partnership” organized by the French clown-president Nicolas Sarkozy. (Sarkozy, as I wrote to my colleague from Belgium Michel Luc, is an “American neo-con with French passport”.)

Once the tandem NATO-al Kaida wins the war in Libya, all advantages of the socialist way of life will end, and instantly the Libyan educational system will be reoriented towards “Teaching of Ignorance by All Possible Means” (as claimed in a book of this title by French philosopher-educator Jean-Claude Michéa[4]). Mammonist Owners of the Word need only simple-minded ignorants who eagerly consume petrol products bringing money to producing corporations, and idiots happy watching TV propaganda programs like “Win a million”. (By the way, the simple reason why cultural life in a liberal society ever more drifts towards accumulation of ignorance is explained very well by Polish Nobel Prize laureate Lech Walesa 20 years ago: “one makes the best money on human stupidity”. And this is the reason why M-KGB, by all possible means, feeds the populace with propaganda of rubbish.)  

In the post-soviet Eastern Europe, which is already divided into a part “A” belonging to EU, and a part “B” consisting of former republics of Soviet Union not yet affiliated with recognizable world powers, the problem of regional partnership still exists. In this local situation, according to plans of American “think tanks”, the place of leading force, which represents liberal France engaged in a creation of “Mediterranean partnership”, was reserved for ultra-liberal Poland, an old colonial ruler of Great Lithuania (Byelorussia), and Ukraine.

So the clown-president Sarkozy from “aristocratic, Hungaro-Jewish family” shared honours with the flamboyant German Foreign Affairs minister Radek Sikorski, conveniently married to imported-from-New York Anne Appelbaum from “Jewish aristocratic family”. All this indicates that in case Belarus enters into a laboriously set up two-decade-old Western trap of “partnership for the development of financial economy”, Byelorussians will finally learn what “modernization” means. It means the total privatization, de-socialization and cretinization of every aspect of public and private life. This is what we observe in Poland and Lithuania, and in the ever more debilitated by the “virus of liberalism”, Russia.

Is it possible to stand up to this “Western” trend of collective mis-development? I heard that in Benghazi, in which city Islamo-NATO-liberal “insurgents” have been terrorizing the population for over three months, the “second front” of war for the salvation of Socialist Libyan Jamahurdia has been formed.

So perhaps in Eastern Europe also in a few months will appear a Peaceful Front fighting for the revival of socialist ideals? But to achieve such Renaissance we shall search, both in Western Europe and post-soviet Russia, for capable-to-reason partners, evidently not these ultra rich hypocrites like Sikorski and Westerwelle, capable only of repeating, like automatons, the mantra of free, controlled-only-by-world-capital, elections.

Notes

[1] The lecture published in a book “The Impact of Regional Groupings On International Relations”, JSCP, Vienna 2004, Austria, present also at the website http://groups.yahoo.com/group/shamireaders/message/74.

[2] All quoted in this paper thoughts of F. Hayek’s were translated from the Polish edition of “Individualism and Economic Order”, 1996; Polish edition by Znak, Kraków 1998.

[3] “Wyklad na temat rozwoju potrzeb” (A lecture on development of needs), Twórczosc, Warszawa, nr 2/1983; also at http://www.niniwa2.cba.pl/obywatel.html.

[4] Jean-Claude Michéa L’enseignement de l’ignorance et ses conditions modernes, ed. Climats (dept. de Flammarion) Paris 1999, 2006.

http://www.szcpv.szm.com/05/marek.html
lub/ou/or www.zaprasza.net/mglogo

[Based on the speech delivered at The International ECOOM-ECAG Conference in Minsk, Belarus, 5 ??y 2011]