They want to have the cake and eat it too
by Sandhya Jain on 30 Jul 2013 7 Comments

In his magisterial commentary on the Indian constitution, DD Basu emphasised that the State cannot make reservations on communal lines as this infringes clauses (i) and (ii) of Article 16. Initially, the larger political minority (Muslims) accepted this as an inevitable legacy of partition, while Christians preferred a low profile as the colonial power departed. In recent decades, however, both groups have been chafing at their “theoretical egalitarianism” being cited to deny them reservations as Scheduled Castes.

 

This is now the holy grail of their political desire. Given the huge controversy over Sonia Gandhi’s food bill, and her known ambition for reservations for minorities (Sachar Committee, National Commission for Linguistic and Religious Minorities), there are concerted moves to push Congress in this direction in order to secure the combined minority votebank as the next general election threatens to be highly contentious, with every political party hell-bent on increasing its vote and seat share.

 

The temptation to woo minorities will be high as the storm over Raj Babbar’s ‘Rs 12 buys a good meal’ has inspired opposition parties to seek ways to deflate the destructive food security legislation. They should begin with their sums. If we take an average poor family of eight (couple + four children + parents) and accept Rs 12 per meal per person as baseline, we need Rs 96/day for one meal and Rs 288 for three meals/day for one family (Rs 8640/month on food alone). As even Congress accepts this estimate as insulting, a realistic assessment is needed, a task best left to the next government.

 

To return to the issue of politically driven reservations for minorities, a former chairman of the National Minorities Commission claims that Indian-style secularism appeases the majority at the expense of the country’s two largest minorities – Muslims and Christians. He argues that at the time of its adoption, the Constitution neither declared any state religion nor proclaimed India a secular state. By pronouncing ‘equality before law and equal protection of laws’ as fundamental rights, it mandated the state not to discriminate citizens ‘on grounds only of religion, race, caste, sex, place of birth or any of them’ in respect of public places and employment or appointment under the state.


Ostensibly, this made the country ‘secular’. But several specific provisions for certain groups, incorporated in the Constitution from its inception, or inserted later, benefited particular religious communities. Thus, Sikhs won the right to carry the kirpan, and the governments of Kerala and Tamil Nadu were asked to pay substantial annual annuities to dewasom temples. Moreover, Scheduled Caste reservations were specific to the Hindu community, though Sikhs managed to get included six years later, and Buddhists after four decades.

 

Both monotheist groups claim that they share the same castes as Hindus, and that their global character has not been able to protect scheduled caste converts from discrimination within the respective faith communities. They resent that when a Scheduled Caste Hindu, Buddhist or Sikh embraces Christianity or Islam, he loses his SC status and privileges, which are restored on return to the original faith. Muslim and Christian leaders now want reservations extended to scheduled caste converts in their respective religions.

 

This is political gimmickry at its worst. Muslim and Christian leaders know that to amend the Indian Constitution to extend recognition to the existence of caste among them amounts to inserting a Hindu institution into two monotheistic religions that do not recognise caste, and in fact invite conversion to overcome caste disabilities in Hindu society.

 

Many issues arise from this. First, leaders of both communities must answer how and when they decided to accept caste discrimination within their fold, to the extent that they wish to institutionalise it. Why has the cash-inundated church, which is the largest landowner and runs the largest number of educational, including professional, institutions in the country, been unable to uplift converts from marginal sections of society? Why does the church resist demands from lower caste converts for financial scrutiny and accountability of funds received by the church and affiliated institutions and NGOs run by it? Christian medical colleges recently fought to free themselves from the nationwide entrance examination. Given that they are making money hand over fist, there is simply no excuse for their inability to uplift the former scheduled castes.

 

Muslim organisations are similarly well-funded by their global co-religionists. Moreover, Islam has a movement, tablighi, which focuses on removing all traces of pre-Islamic traditions and culture amongst the devout. It is amazing that the tablighi movement has failed to address the issue of eradicating caste and racial distinctions among believers; this is obviously an urgent priority.

 

The flip side of the move to get caste-based reservations for monotheistic religions is that this would be a form of religious aggression on the part of the Indian State, as it amounts to legislating Hindu institutions and practices into their basic structure. It is true that both faiths are demanding this to improve their access to government quotas via scheduled caste converts, but if the doors to Central legislation to reconstruct the very form of a religion are thus opened, it could have unintended consequences.

 

Christians may ponder if they are open to Government by law reserving promotions in church hierarchy for members from the scheduled castes, who have long been clamouring for upward mobility. Can the Indian Government, like the People’s Republic of China, decide the appointments of Bishops and Archbishops?

 

Similarly, Muslims may consider if the Government should henceforth legislate to undo the havoc wrought on poor Muslim women by Rajiv Gandhi’s disgraceful Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act 1986? After all, the move was opposed by several respected jurists from the community itself.

 

Islam and Christianity are both religions of the Book. If they want to amend their character in India for a political advantage or any other reason, then, as non-natal faiths, they must first amend their scriptures and insert the recognition of caste and caste-based discrimination into the Koran and the Bible. Only then can the Indian Constitution extend caste-based recognition to underprivileged castes in their midst.

 

The alternative is to apologise to the former scheduled castes for the centuries of neglect, social abuse, and economic deprivation, and urge them to return to their natal faith. There cannot be any ‘protective discrimination’ for those who have cheated and betrayed the most vulnerable of their flock.

The Pioneer, 30 July 2013

User Comments Post a Comment
Gem of an article. Kudos. Now, let us wait for "Pak Observer" and " Syrian Christian Verghese" , the unique group of .... belonging to the desert cults to come out with their usual vomit.
Rama
July 30, 2013
Report Abuse
Sandhya in TN 95% of Muslims enjoy reservation as BCs and OBCs. Ditto with Christians. The only category which has not been appropriated by these two Abrahamic cults is the SC category, Direct readers to my Plainspoeak titled it is Religion not caste that hides behind reservation. That has all numbers. This is a timely article. RR
Radha Rajan
July 30, 2013
Report Abuse
Good reminder to political leadership across the board.Those claiming to represent Hindus should warn against any such mischief planned by the anti nationals occupying power centers in the country.
Muslims and Christian leadership too should be exposed for this shamelessness.First they came and told us that theirs is an egalitarian
faith.Now they say they could not achieve egalitarian objectives promised at the time of conversion.So better allow us to "retain" our past.Why? If they wish to retain, they can always return.
Jitendra Desai
July 30, 2013
Report Abuse
Sandhya Jain,you seriously expect Qur'an to change/amend like Christians and Hindus have been "amending" their respective scriptures over the centuries,you got to be kidding!
This curse of caste (from Brahman brain washing of the lower castes for over centuries) is still taking its toll even on the reverted Muslims which is totally against the core teachings and tenets of islam.
Islam is very very clear on the position of segregation of people according to race,color,language and gender.The Prophet's (sw) made it crystal clear in his last sermon as he said:

"O People, lend me an attentive ear, for I know not whether after this year, I shall ever be amongst you again. Therefore listen to what I am saying to you very carefully and take these words to those who could not be present here today".


O' People, just as you regard this month, this day, and this city as Sacred, so regard the life and property of every Muslim as a sacred trust. Return the goods entrusted to you to their rightful owners. Hurt no one so that no one may hurt you. Remember that you will indeed meet your lord, and that he will indeed reckon your deeds. Allah has forbidden you to take usury (interest), therefore all interest obligation shall henceforth be waived. Your capital, however, is yours to keep. You will neither inflict nor suffer any inequity. Allah has judged that there shall be no interest and that all the interest due to Abbas ibn 'Abd'al Muttalib (Prophet's uncle) shall henceforth be waived...”


"O People, it is true that you have certain rights with regard to your women, but they also have rights over you. Remember that you have taken them as your wives only under Allah’s trust and with His permission. If they abide by your right then to them belongs the right to be fed and clothed in kindness."


O People, listen to me in earnest, worship Allah, say your five daily prayers (Salah), fast during the month of Ramadan, and give your wealth in Zakat. Perform Hajj if you can afford to.


"All mankind is from Adam and Eve, an Arab has no superiority over a non-Arab nor a non-Arab has any superiority over an Arab; Learn that every Muslim is a brother to every Muslim and that the Muslims constitute one brotherhood. Nothing shall be legitimate to a Muslim which belongs to a fellow Muslim unless it was given freely and willingly. Do not, therefore, do injustice to yourselves."


"O People! No Prophet or apostle will come after me and no new faith will be born. Reason well, therefore O People! and understand words that I convey to you. I leave behind me two things, the Qur'an and the Hadith and if you follow these you will never go astray."


"All those who listen to me shall pass on my words to others and those to others again; and may the last ones understand my words better than those who listen to me directly. O Allah, be my witness, that I have conveyed your message to your people.

So you be the judge and correct your "knowledge" about Islam's position on these matters.
observer
July 30, 2013
Report Abuse
Excellent timely article ! The wealthy minority institutions have a twofold aim:

1. Appropriate whatever is Hindu, in this instance, the pittance that goes to the SCs.

2. Fatten their already fat resources.

Hindus must vigorously oppose these machinations.
Dr.Vijaya Rajiva
July 31, 2013
Report Abuse
Good and timly article.
arun
August 05, 2013
Report Abuse
PROCESS OF MUSLIM APPRAISAL ARE STILL CONTINUED
The then Chief Minister Karunanidhi’s scandalous act of releasing nine jihadis from prison on the birth anniversary of Annadurai and commuting their specified sentences has to be viewed in the backdrop of the fact that 12 most wanted terrorists are prowling free in Tamil Nadu. They include Abu baker Siddique alias Kakka (7 cases), Ayub alias Ashraf Ali (9 cases), Mohammed Ali alias Yunus alias Mansoor (3 cases), Mujib-ur Rahman alias Muji (5 cases), Rasool Mydeen (2 cases), Jaguar Sadiq alias Tailor Raja alias Valarntha Raja (5 cases), Toufeeque (2 cases), Mushtaq Ahmed (Chennai RSS headquarters blast case), and Ibrahim, Ashraf Ali, Noohi NP alias Mankave Rasheed and Kunju Mohammed alias Gani (all Coimbatore blast case).
ravi
August 05, 2013
Report Abuse