Global Meat Industry - Depths of Depravity
by Radha Rajan on 26 Dec 2008 0 Comment

[In a chilling exercise to control the outbreak of avian flu in just four districts of Assam, an unprecedented 4.25 lakh birds have been exterminated this month. Should the disease spread, one cannot even envisage the extent of slaughter that will be unleashed against these mute and defenceless creatures. Sanatana Dharma has ever upheld that the one who saves is greater than the one who kills. Modern India must therefore ask itself how it moved from the civilisational ethic of ahimsa to giving meat-eating the status of industry, and which Hindu Divinity bestowed upon humans the right to annihilate other species? Given the importance of these issues, we are reprinting below a profound article written by Radha Rajan, Editor, www.vigilonline.com, on 23 March 2004 – Editor]
 

The avian flu, SARS, and earlier the mad cow disease, have all been caused by the human fad for eating animal corpses and carcasses. This is the basic truth, not expressed, not acknowledged, but the only truth that can lead the world back to sanity.


All three diseases assumed trans-continental pandemic proportions because this fast-growing, corpse-eating fad is encouraged by a profiteering international trade and industry in the raising, slaughtering and eating of animals and birds. If vultures, crows and other animals and birds are nature's scavengers who restore balance and hygiene in nature, then the human scavengers who eat animal corpses are consensual partners in this meat-making industry. The meat-eating populace however, unlike nature’s scavengers, participates knowingly in despoiling the environment, causing serious imbalances in nature. These persons are also criminally guilty of either actively violating some of nature's most basic laws of life or condoning it.


The Indian visual media subjected its viewers to the comic spectacle of film personalities in Mumbai and Chennai advocating the eating of chicken without fear of avian flu. Celebrity endorsement for eating the flesh of dead birds? "Too many lives are dependent on this business,” said one famous Hindi film personality. "We have to do our bit to see that their business is not affected by the bird flu scare.” Fair enough.


But have these film artists studied the issue in any detail or depth before endorsing this fad? And more to the point, I did not see any of them taking up the cause of the small farmer or the small manufacturer when the WTO disrupted their lives and rendered them jobless and struggling to survive. So why endorse the eating of chicken and why take up the cause of the chicken industry? It may of course have nothing to do with the fact that all American food-peddlers in India like Macdonald's, Kentucky Fried Chicken and Pizza Hut, and their Indian imitators here depend solely on chicken and other meat for their business or that there is big money involved here.


Mad cow disease


Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE) is known better, highly incorrectly, by its more colloquial name 'mad cow disease.' Only there was nothing mad about the cow, although there is little doubt about the insanity of humans who caused it to happen in the first place. BSE is a degenerative neurological disease (DND) which afflicts cows and calves. DND affects deer and elk, sheep and humans too; only it goes by different names in different species. In deer and elk it is called Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD), in sheep it is called Scrapie and humans suffer from at least three DND that I personally know of. Probably there are more – Alzheimer's, Parkinson's and Creutzfeldt - Jakob disease or CJD.


Humans who had eaten beef from a BSE-afflicted cow have been killed or are terminally ill with a variant form of CJD, vCJD. What is important to know is that while Alzheimer's and Parkinson's may occur 'naturally' in humans, BSE or vCJD do not occur spontaneously or naturally in cows and humans. They can only be induced by the eating of contaminated meat.


Cows and cattle were created to be herbivorous. Which means in sane societies, cows would be sent to graze grass, would be fed grains, hay, leaves and fodder. Among humans, in sane civilizations, pregnant women who would soon be nursing their new-born infants are placed under strict dietary regulations and even in western societies doctors advise a no-smoking, no-alcohol way of life in pregnant women so that the milk upon which the new-born would be given life and sustenance is safe and contains the appropriate nutrients. Ditto with cows and buffaloes whose milk is consumed by calves and humans. It makes sense therefore to feed cows whose milk is diverted to grocery stores for human consumption, the kind of food that is in keeping with its nature.


Because Indian civilization considered the act of eating and feeding a sacred religious act, and because food is intrinsically sacred, what we eat and what we feed others is in the nature of an immense responsibility. Eating the right food is an essential part of a good upbringing and an important aspect of our culture.


The first law of nature that was broken in this continuing nightmare of pandemics was that cows, whom nature ordained to be herbivorous, were fed meat in the UK, where BSE first manifested itself. The entire industry of raising, slaughtering, eating and exporting animals and their meat, runs to more than a hundred billion dollars in the US alone. The retail equivalent value of the US beef industry in the US for the year 2003 is an estimated $70 billion, while the value of the cattle and calf production is valued at $27 billion. The value of the export of US beef in 2003 is an estimated $3.3 billion with Japan, Mexico, South Korea and Canada being its biggest importers. So the business of raising, slaughtering, consuming and exporting is worth a cool $100 billion or more; this is big business, big money. The global figures of this corpse-eating industry must be mind-boggling.


When BSE broke out in Britain in 1987, there was no knowledge or awareness of what caused BSE, and what would be the impact of BSE on humans. British cattle owners feed their cows what is called meat and bone-meal (MBM) from sheep. The idea behind feeding cows and calves meat and bones, instead of the normal vegetarian greens and grains, is to increase the body weight of the animals so as to yield more mass of beef upon slaughter. This is called commercial carcass weight of a cow or a calf.


In India, while we still have not started to feed our cows and cattle MBM with an eye on the benefits of slaughter (and if they are, then it is not publicly known), we do something equally perverse and demoniac to chickens. Some poultry farmers do not let the chicken sleep by day or night. Bright lights shine down on the sheds to keep the chicken and chicks awake so that they peck grains all the time. This unhealthy eating spree increases their body weight in an unnaturally short period of time. Many chicks die of heart failure. This terrible and ugly truth is never told and those who thoughtlessly eat chicken as a fad or as an unhealthy dietary habit do not care to know, or simply do not care.


Similarly, the ugly truth about feeding cows and calves meat and bones would never have come out in the open if it were not for the outbreak of BSE. The meat and bones of even sheep afflicted by Scrapie were converted to MBM for cows and calves. BSE in Britain, where it first manifested itself and assumed pandemic proportions, must have been caused by one of the two reasons: either that there were no cases of Scrapie in the sheep in Britain until the 1980s, or that British farmers did not start the demoniac practice of feeding their cows MBM until the 1980s.


In the case of the former, we still do not know if Scrapie occurs naturally in sheep or if it happened in so wide-spread a manner in the 1980s because some other laws of nature were violated or broken. If it is the latter, then the farmers who knew that their sheep could be afflicted by Scrapie nevertheless did not know of the terrible consequences of feeding cows MBM from Scrapie-afflicted sheep. So there is no way they could have known about the consequences of humans consuming beef from BSE cows which became BSE cows only because they were fed MBM from diseased sheep. Humans consuming contaminated beef were in turn afflicted by vCJD. The demoniac food-chain started by humans, as a consequence of the process of natural justice, came back to culminate in humans themselves.


The madness doesn't end here. In the US where cows and calves are raised just for beef and veal, there is no sanctity in keeping the calf with the mother. In Hindu temples, the temple opens for devotees only after the morning ritual of cow and calf worship and only after the cow and calf duo have sanctified the sanctum sanctorum with their presence.


I can live with the fact that outside of India, there is no sanctity attached to cow, much less to the cow and calf. But it is difficult to understand how a culture which associates the theme of Pieta with immense sorrow can separate the calf from the mother and deny it the life-giving milk from the mother cow.


No fewer than 200,000 cows were slaughtered in the UK alone between 1986-88 when nearly one thousand cows were being reported sick with BSE every week; and over five million cows altogether were slaughtered around the rest of the world to contain the spread of BSE.


This bloodbath was so unnecessary considering that BSE is not contagious. Because BSE is not a communicable disease, it neither spreads from cow-to-cow nor does it spread from cows-to-humans. Just as Alzheimer's and Parkinson's are not communicable neurological diseases. It afflicts cows and calves only when they are fed infected MBM and they affect humans only when they eat beef from a BSE cow.


The milk from a BSE cow is safe and so are milk products made of milk from BSE cows. But the Americans did not feed their calves milk. The infant calves were separated from their mothers and fed blood! Infants were fed blood because these infants were intended for slaughter too, and because all milk was diverted to the grocery stores, and because you had to provide the calf with good nutrients to make for good beef the Americans fed their calves with blood because blood is rich in protein.


If blood were indeed superior to milk as life-giving food for new-born infants, western societies should ask themselves why are they now propagating breast-feeding through the UN and the WHO instead of feeding their human infants blood from their mothers or better still, cow blood or any other blood purchased from off the shelves in supermarkets.


SARS


The next pandemic to shake the world was SARS. Nothing can better explain the fact that scientists are still bewildered and without a clue about the origins and the exact nature of the disease than that the description of the disease is its name: severe acute respiratory syndrome.


Severe and acute mean the same thing and yet, far from being tautological or redundant, we have retained both severe and acute in the name because these were its most distinctive characteristics. A very severe respiratory disorder.


On the surface, no different from pneumonia or influenza with acute cold, high fever, headache and rigor, and yet this respiratory disorder, unlike pneumonia, was communicable, was spreading across China, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Vietnam, Singapore and other countries of Eastern Asia, and to Europe and North America.


SARS, (until the description became the name and which when it first broke out was referred to for some time as atypical pneumonia), was also a killer. The most severely affected countries were China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Vietnam and Singapore – peoples with very similar eating habits, it may be added. Of the 8422 cases in all that were reported in 29 countries, the maximum number of fatalities, 908 deaths, occurred in these countries alone. Eight other deaths occurred in the rest of the world.


SARS is a new strain of corona-virus and a corona-virus is different from the general virus because of its 'unique' shape. Frantic research in 11 laboratories across the world in the first three months of the year 2003, when the SARS pandemic was at its peak and generating widespread panic, established also that this new strain had its origins in some animal. But until January of 2004, scientists around the world refused to tell us how this corona-virus 'jumped' from animal to humans.


SARS re-surfaced in China again in 2004 and one person, a man, affected by the disease, confessed to have eaten the meat of a civet cat. The civet cat is a wild cat and so is a raccoon dog, both of which are hosts for this virus, and both of which are eaten by the Chinese people. People of the East and South East Asian regions are reputed to eat anything that crawls, walks or flies, except maybe the rat and the cockroach. The SARS virus or a strain of this virus closely resembling it, is supposed to affect wild animals and wild birds and SARS is reported to have been caused because of the Chinese fad for eating the meat of wild animals and birds which were captured, bred and marketed for slaughter.


Unlike the avian flu, the SARS virus did not jump from animals to humans because of proximity. The virus closely resembling the SARS virus which affects wild animals entered the genes of humans consuming the meat of animals and birds affected by this virus. Inside the human gene, this virus probably came into contact with another virus affecting humans, mutated and assumed new qualities which made it more virulent, communicable by nature and a killer.


Thus this animal virus, which by nature did not jump from animals to humans, acquired this quality of 'jumping' upon mutation and became a communicable pandemic. It became SARS. Even now, the WHO website does not say categorically that SARS which first occurred in the Guangdong province in South China was a new disease created because humans ate the meat of animals and birds already affected by a virus which, when it entered the human gene, mutated to become the SARS corona-virus. The first reported chain of transmission from human-to-human began on 16 November 2002. This truth of the meat-eating origins of SARS is not explicitly or unambiguously stated. It is for us to delve into the depths of innumerable disease status reports, put two and two together, to arrive at this startling truth.


Globalisation and the new pandemics


Very little is said either about the role of globalization in the origins and the spread of these new pandemics or about the senseless violation of nature's laws. Before the advent of railways, eating habits were decided by what was available locally – only those grains, vegetables, fruits, oils, spices and nuts were eaten which were cultivated and transported locally or from nearby villages and towns. Even meat-eaters did not transport animals and birds from any long distance. They ate the meat of those animals and birds which were to be found or were raised locally, or even in their own homes. Meat-eating was not a daily event; it was consumed perhaps once or twice a week and on special occasions.


This is in sharp contrast to meat-eating as a fad today, as a daily obsession, as an industry. Cows and cattle are now imported and exported across national borders, across seas, across continents. The physiology and the metabolism of cows and cattle, like humans, are defined by the environment into which they are born and this in turn influences the kind of food that they eat. Which is why an Indian looks different from a Chinese who is different from a European who is different from an African. We not only look different, our bodies are different, our internal systems are specific to our environment. We dress differently, eat differently.


The common ailments and illnesses to which we are susceptible, and some of the more virulent and communicable diseases, are also governed by the environment, our physiology, metabolism and our eating habits. Ditto with cows, buffaloes and cattle. Within India alone, we will find different sub-species of cows, bulls and buffaloes, goats and sheep, in different parts of the country, in different regions of the same state.


When animals for the meat industry are transported live across continents, the dangers of area-specific diseases and species- and pedigree-specific diseases becoming global are that much greater. Not content with eating the meat of their own animals, corpse-eaters around the world today desire to eat the corpses of animals and birds from other countries. We thus have Canada importing cows from Japan, Japan importing beef from the US, and Asian countries like Malaysia importing meat from Europe.


Even India tried her hand at importing ostriches from Australia to start ostrich farming in Tamil Nadu, a move that drew sharp protests from local animal rights activists. Compound this with different climatic conditions, different environments and different feeding patterns and habits of these animals in their home countries and we have several major volatile and variable factors that could trigger new diseases affecting local animals and peoples who may not possess immunity from these diseases.


BSE, SARS and now the avian flu have proved this beyond doubts and arguments. Cows and cattle, unlike migratory animals and birds, are not meant to cross oceans and travel great distances. This is yet another fundamental law of nature that the meat industry has failed to respect. Not just live cattle and birds, but beef and meat too, are imported and exported, and as a package deal come the diseases along with the meat. And when there is a global panic, the affected countries begin to do what they ought to have done in the first place – stop all movement of live animals and birds intended for slaughter across national borders and freeze import and export of meat.


Trans-continental pandemics have been caused also by the jet-hopping tourist, corporate executive, industrialist and businessman travelling from one country to another. These agents of globalised economy are the most common vectors of all communicable diseases. This too has been proved beyond doubt by the SARS pandemic.


Avian flu


Close on the heels of the SARS scare, came the avian flu contagion. Avian influenza is an infectious disease of birds caused by type A strains of the influenza virus. The disease, which was first identified in Italy more than 100 years ago, occurs worldwide.


Influenza viruses belonging to the Type A category have several sub-types. These subtypes are broadly categorised into the HA and the NA varieties depending on the nature of the surface proteins of these viruses. Only five sub-types in the Influenza Type A category affects humans – three belonging to the HA variety and two belonging to the NA variety. But birds are known to be affected by viruses of all sub-types and this is the core of the issue.


While influenza viruses affecting wild birds have little impact upon them, the same viruses assume virulence and prove fatal to domestic birds like chicken, ducks and turkeys. And they assume pandemic proportions when they affect birds bred in captivity and in confined spaces, and can then spread rapidly from farm-to-farm, becoming more and more virulent. When new influenza viruses emerge among humans, they are usually killers because humans have developed neither the immunity nor the vaccines to resist them. And once the virus emerges and spreads, it establishes itself and cannot be rid for several years, sometimes even for a century.


The current avian flu virus of the H5N1 strain first emerged in S. Korea in December 2003. By January the flu had spread to Vietnam, Thailand, Laos, Cambodia, China and Pakistan. The flu had also emerged in distant Delaware in the US, where some 12,000 birds have been slaughtered to contain the pandemic, and even in the Netherlands around the same time. It is obvious there is a link somewhere and the link can only be import and export of poultry, poultry feed or the import and export of bird meat.


There is a global panic this time because unlike in the previous instances of widespread avian flu pandemics in the US in the 1980s and in Hong Kong in 1997, in 2000, and again in 2003, which affected only the birds, this time the flu had 'jumped' to humans and was taking a heavy toll in Vietnam and Thailand, mostly children and the elderly, indicating low levels of natural resistance. It has not yet been confirmed that the virus is communicable like SARS.


It therefore remains only to be proved that it was the eating of birds affected by the flu virus which caused the virus to jump from birds to humans. Just as the world is still silent about how the SARS corona-virus 'jumped' from animals to humans and became communicable upon mutation, the world is silent about how the avian flu, which is supposed to affect only birds, has now 'jumped' from birds to humans.


Recent research has shown that viruses of low pathogenicity can, after circulation for sometimes short periods in a poultry population, mutate into highly pathogenic viruses. During a 1983–1984 epidemic in the US, the avian flu virus initially caused low mortality among birds, but within six months became highly pathogenic, with a mortality approaching 90%. Control of the outbreak required destruction of more than 17 million birds at a cost of nearly US$ 65 million. During a 1999–2001 epidemic in Italy, the avian flu virus, initially of low pathogenicity, mutated within 9 months to a highly pathogenic form. More than 13 million birds died or were destroyed.


The corpse-eaters and the meat industry in which nations have big stakes and which affects their economies, are unwilling to spit out this truth about the risks of meat-eating. There is some ballyhoo that the virus jumped from birds to humans because of the proximity of humans who handled the affected birds. In which case, health authorities have to tell us why it did not jump in Hong Kong in 1997 or earlier in the US in 1983.


Unless the avian flu virus too has mutated since 1997 and this mutation has caused the virus to become communicable in nature, which makes it 'jump' from birds to humans. If indeed there has been a mutation of the avian flu virus, then scientists have still not told us why it mutated; unless as in the case of SARS, the avian flu too has them flummoxed.


The strangest thing about this mutation is that while this virus now 'jumps' from birds to humans, it is not being communicated from human-to-human. At least, not yet. Scientists researching the deaths by avian flu in Thailand and Vietnam have not been able to establish so far that humans affected by the avian flu communicated the disease to others. Which brings me back to my theory – the disease 'jumps' from birds to humans only when humans consume the meat of birds affected by the avian flu virus.


The global meat industry has resulted in intensive farming of animals and birds which violates basic laws of nature. A person with a modicum of experience will tell you that a patient admitted to a hospital for any illness stands at great risk of developing secondary infections in the hospital, which may complicate the case and may even prove fatal. This is what confinement does to humans.


Unnatural confinement of any creature that has legs or wings, which are meant to be used to move freely, can only lead to illness and depression. And confining animals and birds by the tens and thousands in animal and poultry farms, is a sure prescription for pandemics. Breeding animals in unnatural conditions, keeping them alive in unnatural conditions, feeding them unnatural foods and in an unnatural manner, reflects gross abuse of the intrinsic sanctity of all creation, of all forms of life.


Having violated all these fundamental laws, to go on and move animals and birds unnaturally over long distances, is only to compound the first abuse. Bringing a life-form into this world by the hundreds of thousands through unnatural pregnancies and breeding methods, only to kill them or slaughter them, first for meat-as-a-fad or to contain diseases caused by human perversions, is the nadir of human depravity.


Cows, cattle and birds have all been slaughtered and culled by the hundreds of millions in the last thirty years alone, to contain the spread of diseases which humans have caused to happen in the first place. While these animals have been killed and culled, the diseases continue to remain at large. BSE is still around and so is SARS and so is the avian flu. In 1997, in spite of the fact that Hong Kong culled its entire chicken, duck and other poultry stock, the disease re-surfaced in 2000 and again in 2003. These insane corpse-eaters are endangering the world and the lives of even those who still respect the laws of nature and have respect for all forms of life and do not participate in this madness.


Courtesy vigilonline

[http://www.vigilonline.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=870&Itemid=114]

User Comments Post a Comment

Back to Top