End of the Rajapaksa regime?
by Suhas Chakma on 06 Jan 2015 2 Comments

In the upcoming snap Presidential election in Sri Lanka slated for 8 January 2015, President Mahinda Rajpaksa’s defeat looks imminent, sans rigging. A formidable rainbow coalition of the opposition under the leadership of joint opposition candidate Maithripala Sirisena is firmly in place. Sri Lankans’ disenchantment with corruption, rising cost of living, disregard for the rule of law, politicisation of all areas of governance and nepotism characterised by all pervasive presence of the Rajapaksa family members in all departments that run Sri Lanka’s life have crossed the limits of tolerance.


While the Tamil National Alliance (TNA) was never expected to support Rajapaksa, who claims himself as the ‘known devil’, the resignation of Palani Digambaram and V Radhakrishnan, both Deputy Ministers representing Indian origin plantation Tamils, to support the Sirisena candidature, was a blow.

For the first time in the history of Sri Lanka, the unity of the minorities against a Presidential candidate has become complete. The votes of the minorities with 32% share of the total votes with Tamils representing 15.3%, followed by Muslims with 9.3% and Christians with 7.4% can be decisive.


Apart from Pope Francis’ visit to Sri Lanka from 12 to 15 January 2015, Rajapaksa has simply nothing on which to position a bid for re-election. The victory over the LTTE no longer sells. The President and his brothers also cannot lambast the West and the United Nations after having barred the visit of the UN Commission of Inquiry (CoI) on Sri Lanka into the country. In fact, on 23 December 2014, Rajapaksa conceded to the main plank of the opposition as he promised to reform the powerful presidency within one year if re-elected. Sri Lankans are unlikely to be convinced by enlightenment gained by Rajapaksa in the face of defeat. 

The dissatisfaction of the Tamils against the Rajapaksa regime requires little introduction. However, it is the relentless attacks which made the Muslims and the Christians anti-Rajapaksa. On 2 July 2014, three UN experts on freedom of religion, minority issues, and summary executions in a joint press statement urged the government of Sri Lanka to adopt urgent measures to stop the promotion of racial and faith-based hatred, and violence against Muslim and Christian communities by Buddhist groups with extremist views, and bring perpetrators of this violence to justice. According to the UN experts, more than 350 violent attacks against Muslims and over 150 attacks against Christians were reported in Sri Lanka in the last two years. 

On the other hand, the results in six out of nine provincial elections held during 2013- 2014 showed gradual fall in the vote share of the United People’s Freedom Alliance (UPFA) among the Sinhalese majority. 

In the elections held in Central, Northern and North Western provinces in September 2013, the TNA won over 78% of the vote in the North defeating the ruling UPFA, while UPFA won in the North Western and Central provinces with 66% and 60% respectively. 

Further, in the elections held in Western Province and Southern Province in March 2014, the UPFA won in both the Provinces but lost seats and vote share. While in the Western province, it won 56 seats compared to 68 seats in 2009 elections (losing 12 seats), in the Southern Province it lost 5 seats with 33 seats won compared to previous 38 seats. The UPFA’s vote share fell by about 11 percent in the Western Province, from 64.73% in 2009 to 53.35% and in the Southern Province from 67.88% to 58.06%, approximately 10 per cent. 

Similarly, the UPFA won the elections in the Uva Province held in September 2014, but its vote share fell sharply by 21% from 72% in 2009 to 51%, resulting in the loss of six seats. 

The opposition has further consolidated its support base among the Sinhalese majority since the last provincial elections while it garnered support of all the minorities. 

Further, Sri Lankans are also aware that Rajapaksa lacks confidence of international community, in particular, India. Devolution of power for the Tamil minorities apart, the repeated arrests of Indian Tamil fishermen has displeased New Delhi. By opening up the Indian Ocean to China, on which India, US, EU and Australia are on the same page, Rajapaksa appears to have bitten more than he could chew. 

In recent years, India’s support for political parties in neighbouring countries has been critical for the electoral results at home and international recognition. Though the Maoists of Nepal won the constituent assembly elections in April 2008 despite India’s suspicions, the Nepali Congress and the CPN-UML with the support of India trounced the Maoists in the elections held in December 2013.


In the parliamentary elections held in Bangladesh in January 2014, the Awami League won 153 out of 300 parliamentary seats even before the first vote was cast as the opposition Bangladesh National Party boycotted the elections, and India’s unstinted support to the Awami League was critical for its recognition at international level.


In Bhutan, the People’s Democratic Party stormed into power in July 2013 after India stopped kerosene supply to Bhutan just prior to the elections to send a clear message of India’s disapproval of the Druk Phuensum Tshogpa government.

In this context, the visit of India’s National Security Advisor Ajit Doval to Sri Lanka on 2 December has significance beyond the Galle Dialogue 2014 that Mr Doval addressed. Mr Doval’s meeting, among others, with joint opposition Presidential candidate Sirisena, former President Chandrika Kumaratunga, former Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe and leaders of the TNA, had significant impact to shape up the united opposition and unify the minority leaders against Rajapaksa.


President Rajapaksa might have the support of Beijing. However, India has been far ahead on propping up favourable regimes in neighbouring countries than China, which is at a loss with the intricacies of electoral politics, and feels more comfortable to deal with dictators or their families.

Nonetheless, Sri Lankans deserve free and fair elections. Skullduggery on voting day cannot be ruled out, more so because the most powerful of the Rajapaksa brothers, Defence Secretary Gotabaya, fears possible indictment by the UN CoI which is scheduled to submit its report to the 28th Session of the UN Human Rights Council in March 2015. The international community must monitor the 2015 Presidential election and take effective measures if Sri Lankans are denied less than free and fair elections.


President Rajapaksa called snap elections two years ahead of the current term to prolong family rule. This decision is a clear indication in itself that irrespective of the outcome, the end of the Rajapaksa dynasty has become irreversible. The cheap tactics adopted by Rajapaksa to invite Bollywood actor Salman Khan to campaign for him only proves his desperation. Both the defeat of President Rajapaksa in the elections of January 2015 and indictment of Gotabaya by UN Commission of Inquiry (CoI) on Sri Lanka remain within the realm of possibilities.


The author is Director, Asian Centre for Human Rights

User Comments Post a Comment

Back to Top