From Jinnah to Khwaja: ideological malleability of a self-styled loh purush
by Shreerang Godbole on 16 Dec 2008 11 Comments

L.K. Advani, the man whom the Bharatiya Janata Party would make Prime Minister, evidently thinks he can fool most Hindus all the time. The political fortunes of the BJP, floundering in the maelstrom of Gandhian Socialism, had touched a new low in the aftermath of Indira Gandhi’s assassination in 1984. But once Ayodhya captured the imagination of the Hindus, Advani hijacked it to bring himself to the centre-stage of national politics. 


Subsequent events proved that when the netaji was riding the rath to Ayodhya, he was in fact taking Hindus for a ride. Unmindful of the day in 1948 when his family had to finally flee the land of his forefathers because of marauding Muslims, Advani has consistently described the Babri demolition as the “saddest day in my life”. He has thus repeatedly insulted the memory and the sacrifice of kar sevaks who gave up their lives in the run up to this epic event.


Once in power, Advani repeatedly humiliated Hindus. His deliberate mishandling of the Ayodhya issue, his masterful inactivity during the kidnapping and brutal murder of six senior RSS pracharaks, his disastrous non-performance as Home Minister in the face of repeated jihadi attacks, his eulogy to Jinnah, his defiant chumminess with individuals whose credentials are suspect, his inane stand that terrorism has no religion, his statement equating re-conversion with conversion…the list is endless.


Then, sensing that there was an even chance of finally ascending the PM’s gaddi, netaji is grabbing every opportunity to shed the undeserved appellation of a hard-line Hindu leader - a designation he assumed to fool Hindus while flirting with secularists, and one with which secularists have in turn been taunting him with.


Recently (1 December 2008), Advani sent a ghilaf or chadar to the tomb of Sufi ‘mystic’ Khwaja Mu‘inu’d-Din Chisti (hereafter “the Khwaja”) at Ajmer, Rajasthan. This offering, in the immediate aftermath of the Mumbai massacre, is only the latest instance of the ideological malleability of this self-styled loh purush. For this is not the first time Advani has paid respects to the Khwaja.


During his Bharat Suraksha Yatra in 2006, Advani visited this tomb amidst much fanfare. Advani (or his ghost-writer) described that visit in considerable detail in his autobiographical tome. Pictures of Advani solemnly bowing his head to the Khwaja’s memory occupy pride of place on his personal website. Advani mentions that visit as a shining example of his commitment to the phoney secularism he once accused his opponents of practicing. When Advani’s party colleagues (poor gullible souls) suggested that he visit the sacred Hindu shrine of Pushkar, Advani insisted on adding the Khwaja’s dargah to his itinerary! Asked why he chose to visit the dargah, the dhimmi in him responded: "Ajmer aaker mera farz tha ki itni pak saaf jageh par aana." 


To be fair to Advani, he has not been the only BJP leader to rub his nose before the Khwaja’s tomb (incidentally, tomb-worship is a very un-Hindu practice; it is Abrahamic faiths that make a morbid fetish of their dead). Toadying to the secularist establishment has been the hallmark of top BJP (and Bharatiya Jan Sangh) leaders. As Chief Minister of Rajasthan, Bhairon Singh Shekhawat spent a cool Rs. 25 lakh from the state exchequer for the renovation of the dargah!  Little wonder then that when Shekhawat stood for the Presidential election as NDA candidate in 2008, a delegation led by Sayed Abdul Sari Chishti from the Ajmer Dargah met Shekhawat and pledged to campaign among Muslim MPs and MLAs on his behalf.


As Prime Minister, Atal Bihari Vajpayee regularly offered chadar at the Khwaja’s tomb during the annual ursIdeological rot has a way of percolating down. On 27 March 2006, a herd of 40 BJP MLAs from Jharkhand led by then Chief Minister Arjun Munda went on a thanksgiving pilgrimage to the Khwaja’s tomb. If this is the sort of ideological clarity and awareness of history that so-called Hindu leaders have, is it any wonder that thousands of ordinary Hindus flock to the Khwaja’s tomb? 


To return to Advani and his patron saint! Had Advani been intellectually honest, he would have cared to examine the Khwaja’s record before kowtowing to his memory. Saiyid Athar Abbas Rizvi’s classic two-volume A History of Sufism in India (Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers Pvt. Ltd., 1986 reprint) gives the Khwaja’s career in detail. Born circa 1142 CE in Sistan province of present-day Iraq, the Khwaja travelled widely and finally left for Delhi from Lahore in March 1206. He reached Ajmer towards the end of the same year. As Rizvi writes, “It would appear that the Khwaja lived in Ajmer fort and his simple, ascetic life was an inspiration to both the Turkic ghazis, who swelled the Islamic forces through a lust for plunder, and to the Hindus who were forcibly converted to Islam”(Vol.1, p. 121). 


What was the Khwaja’s record vis-à-vis the Hindus whose descendants are the bulk of Advani’s voters?  Ajmer (and Delhi) was then ruled by Rai Prithviraj (called Pithaura Rai by Islamic chroniclers). Later Islamic accounts gloatingly describe how the Khwaja stamped out idolatry and unfurled the flag of Islam. Some chroniclers credit him with effecting the conversion of 700 Hindus. Prithviraj’s mother, an expert in astronomy and magic, had prophesized the Khwaja’s arrival twelve years before the actual event. She drew pictures of the Khwaja and Prithviraj had them distributed to his officers to prevent the Khwaja’s entry into his kingdom. Every foreigner’s face was compared to that picture.


At Samana, Prithviraj’s officials recognized the Khwaja from his picture and requested him to stay at the palace. But Prophet Muhammad warned the Khwaja during his meditation (so Islamic chroniclers claim!) against the treachery of officials, so he left for Ajmer. There, the Khwaja and his followers moved to a place near the Anasagar Lake. His servants killed a cow and cooked kebabs for him. Some members of the Khwaja’s party went to Anasagar and some to Pansela Lake for ablutions. There were 1000 temples on the two lakes. The Brahmans stopped the ablutions and the Muslim party complained to the Khwaja.  He sent his servant to bring water for his ewer.


As soon as the ewer touched the Pansela Lake, all the lakes, tanks and wells around became dry. The Khwaja went to the Anasagar Lake temple and asked the name of the deity. He was told it was Sawi Deva. The Khwaja asked whether the image had talked to them. On receiving a negative reply, he made the idol recite kalima and converted it into a human being, naming it Sa’di. 


To cut a long story short, Prithviraj asked his Prime Minister Jaipal to fight the Khwaja.  After allegedly subduing Jaipal with his spiritual powers, the Khwaja asked him to convert to Islam. Jaipal relented, but Prithviraj refused to accept Islam, at which the Khwaja prophesized that Prithviraj would be handed to the Islamic army. Later, Sultan Mu‘izzu’d-din Muhammad’s army arrived from Ghazna, attacked the forces of Prithviraj and defeated them. 


Prithviraj was taken alive and thus the Khwaja’s prophesy was fulfilled. To hitherto celibate Khwaja married at the ripe age of ninety (according to one legend); his second wife was the daughter of a local Hindu chieftain captured in war. 


Shorn of its Islamic triumphalism, the foregoing account leads to the following conclusions:

? The Khwaja indulged in or actively encouraged deliberate vandalism of lakes, idols and temples holy to Hindus
? The Khwaja indulged in cow-slaughter to hurt Hindu sentiments
? The Khwaja effected the conversion of ordinary people and the nobility
? Unmindful of his age, the Khwaja converted and married a Hindu maiden who had been won as war booty (a famed Islamic practice)
? Far from being an ambassador of a mythical Hindu-Muslim unity which leaders from Gandhi to Advani have been mindlessly chasing, the Khwaja was an Islamic zealot


Equally noteworthy is the sustained psychological and physical resistance offered by ordinary Hindus and leaders like Prithviraj in the face of the Islamic onslaught led by the Sultans and Sufis. This is in stark contrast to the meek surrender offered by tired old men like Advani to Abrahamic ideologies bent on destroying Hindu dharma. This time around, Hindus are not willing to be fooled by a leader who reveres the adversary, be it a medieval Khwaja or a modern-day Jinnah! 


The writer is a Pune-based endocrinologist, social activist and author

User Comments Post a Comment
I have been enlightened by your information of this khwaja . I hope one should confront these BJP leaders with this information .

I have a feeling that maybe Advani ji , Arjun Munda are not aware of this past of Kwaja .

In India it is so important to look to be secular to come to power that these BJP leaders are forced to show a muslim face . Some of Hindus leaders who have stayed away from muslims have never been able to take up any administrative post and do any governance in the country .

I am not trying to put your view on these leaders down but some times to achive certain amount of power in socitey inclusion is very important . But in Totallty these leaders are more Hindu than any other Hindu leader. What is use of those Hindu leaders who cannot even get elected to parliament and be part of governance .

We need all kinds of leaders I think . Once who are with our idealogy but mix with muslims , and some who are pure Hindu leaders . In a war it is combination of Varitey that matters in the end .

But I also agree that if a muslim is wrong and anti national one should not meet him for votes or power .

Himanshu Jain
Himanshu Jain
December 16, 2008
Report Abuse
I always had my doubts about Advani. At the height of the Ram Mandir movement - the man wanted nothing more than a few certificates from the secularists. He was literally pleading to be let into the club. I am sickened also by his attempts (through his autobiography) to try and become a sort of Pandit Nehru of modern India; a transcendent leader, who is actually all sound and fury signifying nothing.

I really hope the BJP wakes up an selects Mr. Modi as the candidate for this election. Advani should recognize that his time is past and go gently into the night
Arvind S
December 17, 2008
Report Abuse
One more historical fact which was kept away from Hindus. Like all brainwashed Hindus even I thought that the Sufis are really people of god, I hope you expose these fanatics amongst them.
Mallya
December 17, 2008
Report Abuse
> - The Khwaja indulged in or actively encouraged deliberate vandalism of lakes, idols and temples holy to Hindus

Let me ask a question here. If you as an individual are denied the right to wash your self or drink from a water source that is for all what would you do? Wouldn't any self respected man rebel for this right. Secondly when the khwaja asked the hindu pandits if the idol could come and talk, they did not have an answer. Likewise, if Mr. Sreerang feels so, I would encourage him to participate into debates with the other side of the community rather than pat his back with such ill informed articles and stop blaming Mr. Advani.

> - The Khwaja indulged in cow-slaughter to hurt Hindu sentiments

1. There are many Hindus who are strictly vegetarian. They think it is against their religion to consume non-vegetarian food. But the true fact is that the Hindu scriptures permit a person to have meat. The scriptures mention Hindu sages and saints consuming non-vegetarian food.
2.
a. It is mentioned in Manu Smruti, the law book of Hindus, in chapter 5 verse 30
"The eater who eats the flesh of those to be eaten does nothing bad, even if he does it day after day, for God himself created some to be eaten and some to be eater."

b. Again next verse of Manu Smruti, that is, chapter 5 verse 31 says
"Eating meat is right for the sacrifice, this is traditionally known as a rule of the gods."

c, Further in Manu Smruti chapter 5 verse 39 and 40 says
"God himself created sacrificial animals for sacrifice, ...., therefore killing in a sacrifice is not killing."

d.Mahabharata Anushashan Parva chapter 88 narrates the discussion between Dharmaraj Yudhishthira and Pitamah Bhishma about what food one should offer to Pitris (ancestors) during the Shraddha (ceremony of dead) to keep them satisfied. Paragraph reads as follows:
"Yudhishthira said, "O thou of great puissance, tell me what that object is which, if dedicated to the Pitiris (dead ancestors), become inexhaustible! WhatHavi, again, (if offered) lasts for all time? What, indeed, is that which (if presented) becomes eternal?"
"Bhishma said, "Listen to me, O Yudhishthira, what those Havis are which persons conversant with the rituals of the Shraddha (the ceremony of dead) regard as suitable in view of Shraddha and what the fruits are that attach to each. With sesame seeds and rice and barely and Masha and water and roots and fruits, if given at Shraddhas, the pitris, O king, remain gratifiedfor the period of a month. With fishes offered at Shraddhas, the pitris remain gratified for a period of two months. With the mutton they remain gratified for three months and with the hare for four months, with the flesh of the goat for five months, with the bacon (meat of pig) for six months, and with the flesh of birds for seven. With venison obtained from those deer thatare called Prishata, they remaingratified for eight months, and with that obtained from the Ruru for nine months, and with the meat of Gavaya for ten months, With the meat of the bufffalo their gratification lasts for eleven months. With beef presented at the Shraddha, their gratification, it is said , lasts for a full year. Payasa mixed with ghee is as much acceptable to the pitris as beef. With the meat of Vadhrinasa (a large bull) the gratification of pitris lasts for twelve years. The flesh of rhinoceros, offered to the pitris on anniversaries of the lunar days on which they died, becomes inexhaustible. The potherb called Kalaska, the petals of kanchana flower, and meat of (red) goat also, thus offered, prove inexhaustible.


> The Khwaja effected the conversion of ordinary people and the nobility

Someone needs to prove this point with valid references. Were they really forced or was it out of free will. In todays democratic society everyone has a right to practice his/her own religion and if someone is convinced that some other religion is better that the one that they are following he/she should be free to participate.

> Unmindful of his age, the Khwaja converted and married a Hindu maiden who had been won as war booty (a famed Islamic practice)

Can't anyone marry once he becomes old? In the western countries and now even in India we know of a lot of people who enter into this arrangement at a very ripe age. Do you think that all of them should be put behind bars..

> Far from being an ambassador of a mythical Hindu-Muslim unity which leaders from Gandhi to Advani have been mindlessly chasing, the Khwaja was an Islamic zealot

Neither Gandhi nor Advani are mindlessly chasing such efforts of Hindu-Muslim unity. They are aware of the fact that in order to have OUR country to be successful not only should the hindu/muslims be united, this effort should encompass other religios sects too.
Murugdas P
December 17, 2008
Report Abuse
Hard hitting article! Reminded me of Sita Ram Goel. I wonder if Advani, Vajpayee, Shekhawat, Munda etc had any clue about the Khwaja's history. Or several Hindus for that matter! Need more of such eye-openers.
Yash
December 18, 2008
Report Abuse
Excellent and informative article.
The Khwaja's background is well known and the author has interestingly used it to draw comparisons with the modern day "politicians".
I think as long as like minded Hindus(like the author and many of this websites readers including myself) cannot have the numbers on their side we shouldnt expect leaders like Advani to further the Hindu cause.
Of course in a "democracy" we need numbers and unfortunately that is what we have been lacking.I believe, this leads to people like Advani to make such symbolic gestures to the "minority" community so that he can shed his "right wing hindu fiery leader" image to a more socially acceptable (so to say) image.
Mind well outside India, BJP is still a member of the "right wing Hindu" family.
Ajinkya
December 19, 2008
Report Abuse
Tired old men who have lost the stomach to combat the Islamic menace had better retire. We need new men with fresh ideas. The Shekhawats, Vajpayees and Advanis should gracefully retire. And ordinary Hindus need to be educated about the Khwaja. Perhaps the VHP in Rajasthan can start a mass education campaign.
Kanak
December 19, 2008
Report Abuse
Great work sir, please keep it up.
Vikram
December 25, 2008
Report Abuse
'unbelievable ,never knew you were such a good writer beside being an excellent doctor'
suminder kaur
February 03, 2009
Report Abuse
!!! SUPER !!!
!!! DMRU !!!
!!! THIRD-EYE-OPENER !!!
UMESH
October 28, 2009
Report Abuse
Murugdas P the fact that you are defending the Khwaja marrying a Hindu princess CAPTURED as part of a war shows what a degenerate man you are.

Why don't you post under your real name?
Ranvir
October 27, 2010
Report Abuse