Swami Swarupanand is an embarrassment to acharya parampara
by M Pramod Kumar on 26 Jul 2014 28 Comments

Hinduism is the only religion in the world which has the beautiful concept of Ishta Devata - of choosing a favourite personal deity towards whom the devotee can direct single minded devotion. Yaska, the 9th century philosopher, comments that when the population of India was 33 crores, the Indians also worshipped 33 crore Gods and goddesses! Sanatana Dharma grants the freedom to all its practitioners to choose their own ‘god’ or even create a new form to invoke Ishvara!

 

Ishvara, the intelligence which governs and pervades this universe, can be invoked through any form – this is the simple and yet profound principle on which is based the Hindu culture of broad minded acceptance of all sects.

 

Adi Sankara, who revived Sanatana Dharma from the jaws of decay and decline, established the shan-matas or six forms of worship which have come to occupy a central place in Hindu religion today – Ganapatya (invoking Ishvara in the form of Ganesha), Kaumara (Kartikeya or Murugan), Shaiva (Shiva), Shakta (Goddess Durga), Saura (Sun).

 

Our shastras emphasise that while single minded devotion to a particular form (Ishta Nishtha) is necessary for a spiritual novice, but to encourage intolerance or hatred towards worshippers of other forms is unnecessary.

 

The place accorded to a Guru in Hindu tradition is even more significant. The guru who removes ignorance and bestows the highest spiritual knowledge is regarded by the disciple as equal to greater than God himself. Thus, Guru Bhakti (devotion to the Guru) is as much an established practice in Hinduism as murti puja.

 

The Bhagavad Gita lays down this golden principle of non-interference in matters of faith:

“Let not the wise create any disturbance in the understanding of the ignorant who are attached to the results of action.” (Gita, 3.26)

 

Commenting on this verse, Swami Dayananda elaborates: “People who are thought to be enlightened, are considered to be the elite in a given society and whatever they do tends to become law for the others. Therefore, such people are leaders, sresthas. And these leaders... should not disturb the minds of those who follow them. Just as you cannot alter the direction of a river unless you do it very gradually, so too, the direction that a person’s life is taking can only be altered gradually. A sensitive person, one who really cares for another person, brings about a change in that person by going with the flow, altering the direction of his or her life, little by little, in a helpful way.”

 

This indeed has been the wise and mature approach which all the great spiritual leaders and reformers took to bring about a positive transformation or a lasting change in society. They never condemned or cursed the faith of the masses, but if they felt the need to reform some practices, they did it gently without causing hurt or agitation to their followers.

 

Swami Swaroopanand’s hate-filled campaign against Shirdi Sai Baba and his devotees has demeaned the sanctity of the Sankara Peetham and is clearly aimed at driving a wedge into Hindu society. His statements prohibiting the worship of Shirdi Sai and exclusivist interpretations of Hindu shastras are reminiscent of Abrahamic cultures.

 

What is the basis for Swarupanand’s claim that Rama and Krishna alone are allowed to be worshipped as deities? Which scripture says so? The majority of devotees who owe allegiance to the four Sankara Peethams established by Adi Sankara are predominantly Shaivas. But even Mahadeva Shiva does not seem to find a place in Swarupanand’s myopic and distorted understanding of Advaita.

 

Going by this logic, Swarupanand will also eventually attack other Hindu movements centred round saintly figures like Ramakrishna Paramahamsa, Ramana Maharishi or Swami Narayan. None of these saints went around tom-tomming their divinity, but their followers recognized their extraordinary character and contribution and continue to look up to them as God incarnate even today.

 

All centres of Sri Ramakrishna Math have a shrine with only the murtis or photos of Sri Ramakrishna, Sarada Devi or Swami Vivekananda. On festival days like Rama Navami or Krishna Janmasthami, an image or photograph of Rama or Krishna is kept in the shrine and special worship offered to it. This does not in any way mean that devotees and disciples of Ramakrishna Paramahamsa considered Rama or Krishna as inferior deities. A typical puja room in any Hindu household is adorned with the pictures of at least a dozen deities. In order not to displease any of them, the average Hindu lights a camphor and waves an arati around each deity and makes sure that each picture gathers an equal amount of black soot emanating from the karpura arati!

 

All Akshardham temples of the Swami Narayan movement have an image of the child saint Nilkanth who came to be known as Swami Narayan after taking sannyasa under his guru Swami Ramanand. Devotees of Mata Amritanandamayi Devi look upon her as an incarnation of Devi and Krishna. Ammachi occasionally gives darsan to her devotees in ‘Devi Bhava,’ in which she even assumes the attire of Goddess Durga including a crown and other ornaments which Durga is usually adorned with.

 

Will Swaroopanand now start issuing fatwas against the Ramakrishna Math, Swami Narayan Sanstha and scores of other smaller sampradayas which worship their own saints, looking upon them as incarnations of divinity?

 

It is disappointing that with the sole exception of Uma Bharati who challenged Swami Swaroopanand openly, Hindu organisations and leaders are keeping a studied silence over the controversy. Earlier, when Swami Swaroopanand objected to the use of the slogan ‘Har Har Modi’ during the run up to the Lok Sabha polls, Hindu leaders meekly submitted to his bullying. If a section of Hindus look upon Modi as an avatar purush, who has come to rescue them from corruption, terrorism and a host of other ills plaguing the nation, so be it. They have the right to adore their hero and acknowledge him as an expression of divine intervention.

 

Swami Swaroopanand’s divisive agenda must be exposed and refuted decisively. If Hindu society succumbs to such bullying, we will soon be on the road to irreversible decline and disintegration. 

User Comments Post a Comment
Beautiful! Other religious leaders, acharyas and gurus will not comment directly upon Pujya Swami swaroopanandji's views. This is not the Hindu way. Pl let me illustrate this point with another example. When I was speaking to Pujya Kanchi acharya on the generally dismal state of animal affairs in the country, specifically killing if animals for different purposes and all in human self-interest, Pujya acharya's eyes filled with distress. Naturally, another bhasktha sitting along with me remarked how animal sacrifice is known from vedic times. Pujya Acharya paused and chose his worlds carefully. He said and I quote as faithfully as i can, "The vedas are broadly categorised into two: The karma kanda and the gnana kanda. The gnana kanda is universally and eternally true and cannot be changed". This is the Hindu way. Pujya acharya did not say explicitly, the karma kanda can be changed because such an assertion is fraught with danger if small minds begin to think everything is relative. So by asserting the eternal nature of gnana kanda Pujya acharya implied that in the interest of protecting dharma which is dynamic, we must undertsand that dharma is subject to time, place, context. You will see that Hindu leaders will not play with bhakti. Bhakti is precious, the object of bhakti secondary.
Radha Rajan
July 26, 2014
Report Abuse
Again a really nice article from Pramod Ji.
I agree with the author and even speculate that this particular individual, swami, may have his own hidden agenda behind all these non-sense of his.
ajay chahal
July 26, 2014
Report Abuse
Very well written Pramodji. Thanks. I also agree with Radhaji's point that other Gurus and Acharyas will not directly comment upon Dwaraka Sankaracharya's views. I personally feel that Pujya Sankaracharya of Dwaraka could have avoided this controversy. Very unfortunate indeed!
B.R.Haran
July 26, 2014
Report Abuse
Swami Swaroopanand Sankaracharya of Dwarka is strongly affiliated to Congress Party and has been a critic of Narendra Mody.

This move against Sai Baba to be declared as a Muslim and hence not to worship him as a Hindu God as not a single Muslim visits Shirdi and worships him, might be a trigger by Congress Party to create a rift within Hinduism
Kamal
July 26, 2014
Report Abuse
Pramodji..very well written. Kudos to Uma Bhartiji as well who spoke her mind. We have a right to freedom of religion as per Indian constitution. It goes without saying that we are free to choose our Ishta Devta. If Swamiji believes that he can bully lakhs of Sai devotees to give up worshipping Shirdi Sai Baba, he cannot be more naive. We, the Hindus, are proud that we are tolerant towards other religions and we expect our Holy Men to reinforce this spirit among us as well as to keep the Hindus united despite such diversity amongst ourselves. Swamiji should exercise restraint in future and not hurt the sentiments of Sai Devotees or question their faith.
Smita Nair
July 26, 2014
Report Abuse
An interesting read. Pls add Vaishnavam to the Mathas of the Shanmatha, which has been left out by mistake.
Shankar
July 26, 2014
Report Abuse
You article on Swami Swaroopanand's controversy is very timely and correct. Some times we also get frsutrated persons as Swamijis,who cause more embarassment only than positive contribution to the society and religion. The people will automatically reject such people and their puerile ideas and comments. But the article gives a philosophical base for such rejection.
Murali
July 26, 2014
Report Abuse
"Swami Swaroopanand’s divisive agenda must be exposed and refuted decisively. If Hindu society succumbs to such bullying, we will soon be on the road to irreversible decline and disintegration."

--Thank you for a very well thought out article concerning Swaroopananda's questionable antics, whatever be his real motive in doing so. He has rendered himself an unenviable subject of ridicule in the exalted circles of sanatan dharma with his casteist remarks against the Kedarnath Raval, and now the latest fatwa against Shri Sai Ram.

A single dedicated Acharya like Swami Ramdevji has created a yoga revolution in India, with a following among lakhs of Indian men and women. Numerous gurus and their sampradays are actively engaged in reforming the religion and eliminating medieval era malpractices, bringing freshness and humanistic, egalitarian attitudes harking back to original Vedic freedom in spiritual pursuits. All these emerging streams have in fact served to revive and rejuvenate Hinduism in a unifying thrust both nationally and internationally. None of these leading lights claims the power of being the sole authority on matters of free spiritual inquiry and practice, in keeping with the liberating traditions of vedic dharma. The following of this spurious Shankaracharya is not a patch on the following commanded by so many gurus in different parts of India. Whoever appointed him to these two peeths simultaneiously, have broken the conventions established by the revered Adi Shankaracharya. It is time there is a thorough inquiry into his claims as well as his antecedents. In himself he represents an anachronism with his outdated modes and methods of self-arrogated authority for issuing fatwas to the Hindus! He has made a real spectacle of himself, and nothing else.
Swami Sarvananda
July 27, 2014
Report Abuse
Agree completely, except for the approval of the Har Har Modi chant. That is not on religious grounds but on political. It is a dangerous line to cross in a democracy guided as is ours by a profound sense of the sacred. Modi himself should have corrected his ardent followers.
Bhaskar Menon
July 27, 2014
Report Abuse
@Menon - he did - you can find it on his Twitter account also
Vimal
July 27, 2014
Report Abuse
Pramod,

You can go on eulogising your utopian hinduism that is far from ground reality. There is no use in repeatedly countering such baseless articles of macaulay elites, who get well paid jobs and have enough time to write these articles..

So i would go straight in to the issue.

1. Sai Baba as a cult is a heavily manipulated one, controlled by Powerful Secret Forces from behind. The intent is to wean away the people their traditions they are rooted in. This can be further understood if we review the now popular globe trotting gurus who have branches across the world.

2. How come Mata Amritanandanamayi, who is just an ordinary fisherwoman, were able to establish 4 universities across india, and were able to establish so many branches all over the world. She is neither educated enough, NOR have enough resources, NOR have the global reach. Who is the secret force behind these institutions?

Otherwise, how come permission is instantly given to these globe trotting gurus to start schools and institutions, when normal people are NOT even aware of the rules.

Can the author of this article answer this? I know that he knows the answer, but i dare him to speak in public about those.

3. How did and from whom did Vivekananda (I dont call him swamy) got from, and how did he establish such Luxury Mutts across india? And how come Ramakrishna mutt is able to get instant permission across india, to start institutions and mutts? Who is the force behind.

4. How come Swamy Dayananda Saraswathi Swamy, who is just a Good Orator of bagawath geetha able to establish so many mutts across world, both in america and in india? Who is controlling him from behind?


We all know that all four sankara mutts has more than thousand year long tradition. Can any proponent of hinduism explain what kind of tradition that all modern day globe trotting gurus have?

Its time to attack the roots than getting time wasted in superficial arguments
senthil
July 27, 2014
Report Abuse
The reason why i drag the amritanandamayi mutt is bcoz, if we know who is behind that, we can understand who is behind the sai baba cult too. Everything is interconnected, and all those details are available in public in the internet. It needs just right kind of understanding to connect the dots..

Hinduism is an abrahamic religion, created by usurping brahminic rituals and hijacking vedas. By Whom? The answer is obvious.

So instead of getting caught in the trap of vague philosophical argument, its time that we address the real issues first. ie, the people or network behind many of the modern day cults and mutts.
senthil
July 27, 2014
Report Abuse
In the previous article on Sai Baba by Sandhya Jain, i just posted this question, but no one answered.


Adhi Sankara established San Mathams. But he did not recognise Budha or Mahaveer as GODS, eventhough many consider budha as an avatar of vishnu. WHY?

This only indicates that Adhi Sankara was very clear in what constitutes a GOD, and what NOT.

None of the rishis were promoted to GOD by any of our ancient seers. Even Adhi Sankara was NOT promoted to the status of GOD.

Why Sai Baba, who is just a mystic be promoted as GOD? by whom? for what purpose?

Its time for the readers to think about these questions and find answers.
senthil
July 27, 2014
Report Abuse
Unfortunately many "Swamis" these days are largely "businessmen" running multi-national companies (oops, ashrams ) worth millions of dollars !
Shy
July 28, 2014
Report Abuse
I am now very much confused ,after reading Senthil's pertinent questions about who are the powers behind prosperous God men type yogis and swamis.
I have more respect for the Shankracharyas of Kanchi and Sringeri.
I do not know much about Heads of puri/Dwaraka Mutts..
Ashrams are good as they propagate hinduism in all aspects and dimensions for which you need money and facilities.
Maharishi Mahesh Yogi 's TM center in Iowa is run by Americans at the helm.I am neither FOR nor Against Saibaba s of all varities but I respect the devotion and bhakti of millions of Hindus going to Shirdi.
s sitaraman
July 29, 2014
Report Abuse
.@ Senthil
" How come Swamy Dayananda Saraswathi Swamy, who is just a Good Orator of bagawath geetha able to establish so many mutts across world, both in america and in india? Who is controlling him from behind?"
Senthil, your " who, who " questions are getting tiresome. Why don't you find out and enlighten us instead posting questions? You have to do the hard work if you want answers.
I have the utmost respect for HH Swamy Dayanada Saraswathi Ji.
HH Swamy Dayanda Saraswathi had done more to uphold our ( obviously not Senthil's) Dharma than thousands of mouse clicking Senthils. Reminds me of frog in the well.
Rama
July 29, 2014
Report Abuse
@Rama,

/** Senthil, your " who, who " questions are getting tiresome. Why don't you find out and enlighten us instead posting questions? You have to do the hard work if you want answers.
**/

You can better ask the author of this article, who knows all details about the questions i posed. I am tired of debating with ignorant and uprooted urban indians, who has no experience in life outside metro life.

I have posted my questions. Its for the author of this article to answer and for the readers to think over.

Some one is controlling our society from behind. Who is that?
senthil
July 29, 2014
Report Abuse
@sitaraman,

/** I am now very much confused ,after reading Senthil's pertinent questions about who are the powers behind prosperous God men type yogis and swamis.
**/

If you know tamil, please see the below video from healer baskar, who has undergone harsh experiences from the hitech mafia who control all these gurus and swamis.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uwoCKyFV5as
senthil
July 29, 2014
Report Abuse
@Senthil
Ummm, so you have no answers.Just throw mud and run away. Your intention is not to find answers but simple mud slinging.
Rama
July 29, 2014
Report Abuse
Please read this court judgment from Indian Kanoon website:

http://indiankanoon.org/doc/1499064/

Read the last paragraph of the above judgment:

" . . . For all the aforesaid reasons, it is therefore declared that the Act does not apply to the Temple of Shirdi Sai Baba as the same is not an exclusive Hindu institution or endowment and accordingly, the authorities under the Act have no jurisdiction to pass any order, much less orders of appointment of a trustee or non-hereditary trust board. . . ."

The legal position is that Shirdi Sai Baba is not entirely a Hindu. He partly Hindu and partly Muslim. His is a "universal" religion.

Readers may also search for a few more judgments on Shirdi Sai Baba in Google and Indian Kanoon websites.

Suresh
Suresh
July 29, 2014
Report Abuse
Hinduism has the concept of "Ishta Devatha" i.e. personal God.

But, does it mean we can worship every Tom, Dick and Harry?

We worship trees, but do we worship all trees? Some trees such as neem tree and bilva tree are more commonly worshiped than other trees.

It is not that we SHOULD NOT worship other trees, but usually we do not.

We worship animals, but cows and snakes are more commonly worshiped than others.

Hinduism may give a lot of freedom, Hinduism may not dictate things, perhaps in the hope that we will use our discretion to decide what to worship and what not to worship.

Many of the Hindu Gods are forms given to ONE UNIVERSAL GOD. The different Hindu Gods are different powers or different aspects of the same, unique God. They are FINITE representations of INFINITE God. Our Gods are representations of cosmic powers or universal forces.

Hindus worship human beings also, especially sages and yogis like Vyasa, Valmiki, Agasthya, Vasishta, Vishwamithra, Adi Sankara and so on.

Rama and Krishna were human beings, but considered to be direct descendants (Avatars) of God himself.

There are certain similarities or common things among all the above Gods and human beings, whatever those common things may be. For example, law of Karma, or concepts explained in Upanishads, Bhagavad Gita and puranas.

So, given a concept, we can say with reasonable authority, whether it is Hindu or non-Hindu i.e. whether it is part of our Sanatana Dharma or not.

I do not claim to know much about Shirdi Sai Baba, but I feel his teachings or methods are non-Hindu.

There may be nothing wrong in worshiping non-Hindus, it may even be laudable to worship Gods of other religions, but we must do so consciously. To the extent we worship non-Hindus, to that extent we are not Hindus. Perhaps that may be a good thing, that is for you to decide.

"You look to me, I look to you" - this is not according to "my taste". I feel it is very silly or immature. This kind of a thing is not taught in Hindu religious texts, to the extent I know. So, I do not worship Shirdi Sai Baba. But, if somebody finds it to be an interesting teaching of Shirdi Sai Baba, let them worship him.

Ramakrishna Paramahamsa, Ramana Maharshi may have cured illnesses of a few people, but that is not the reason why we worship them.

Adi Sankara took pity on a poor person and recited Kanakadhara Sthothram to shower gold coins and thus remove his poverty, but this is not the reason why we worship Adi Sankara. We worship him for his great commentaries on ancient great religious texts.

We may worship anyone, but let us be clear about why we worship someone.
Suresh
July 29, 2014
Report Abuse
Sometimes, I think of building a temple.

If I build a Hindu temple in future, it would have a big idol of Shirdi Sai Baba as the main deity and a small Shiva linga in an obscure corner.

I don't consider Shirdi Sai Baba as a God. I don't even consider him to be a saint or sage or yogi or a holy person.

Yet I would have his idol in the temple that I may build in future. Why?

The reason is as per our laws and the court judgments, a Shirdi Sai Baba temple is NOT a Hindu temple. So, our governments can not take over, manage, control or interfere with Shirdi Sai Baba temples.

Our SECULAR governments can take over and control any Hindu religious or charitable institution, but they can not go anywhere near non-Hindu places of worship including mosques, churches and Shirdi Sai Baba temples.

So, many Hindus build Shirdi Sai Baba temples to keep our SECULAR government authorities away, but in some corner they worship their own favorite Hindu Gods.

Shirdi Sai Baba is only a mask for our Hindu Gods.

All Shirdi Sai temples may not be built with this reason, but at least a few Shirdi Sai temples are built for this reason.

This is one of the reasons for the growth of Shiedi Sai Baba temples. To keep our SECULAR governments away.

Read this court judgment on Indian Kanoon website and search for other similar court judgments:

http://indiankanoon.org/doc/1499064/

Suresh
July 29, 2014
Report Abuse
@suresh,

/** http://indiankanoon.org/doc/1499064/

Read the last paragraph of the above judgment:

" . . . For all the aforesaid reasons, it is therefore declared that the Act does not apply to the Temple of Shirdi Sai Baba as the same is not an exclusive Hindu institution or endowment and accordingly, the authorities under the Act have no jurisdiction to pass any order, much less orders of appointment of a trustee or non-hereditary trust board. . . ."
**/

This is an excellent reference point.. It exposes two things.

1. The court says that any temples declared as Hindu Temple can be looted and desecrated by government in the name of administration. But not other religions. This is utmost atrocious thing to do.

2. Sai Baba temple committee is legally Non-Hindu, but deceives all the devotees by projecting him as avatar of ishwara. This is a double game. They get the financial power to establish numerous branches, whereas all traditional temples are controlled by government and stripped of the right to manage themselves.

All those moronic hindus who speak length about how hinduism gives them freedom, never ever worked to free the temples from government clutches.

As i said, some hidden forces has been forcibly uprooting people from their tradition by this unjust laws, and by promoting Sai cult and other similar ones.

Its high time, that all urban people to look towards their tradition and sampradaya, and start following what their ancestors have given them.
senthil
July 29, 2014
Report Abuse
Instead of just dismissing Swami Swaroopananda as an embarrassment, let us analyze each sentence uttered by him.

What he said may have 90% non-sense. But, I think it has at least 10% sense.

While dismissing the 90% non-sense, let us also consider the 10% wisdom in what he said.

See this article on Shirdi Sai Baba. Especially, see his teachings in this article. You can search more articles about Shirdi Sai Baba on Google.

http://www.angelfire.com/indie/saints/sai.html

Shirdi Sai Baba's teachings may be considered as non-Hindu or un-Hindu. They are very different from what we find in our ancient religious texts such as Upanishads, Bhagavad Gita or Puranas.

Some say that Shirdi Sai Baba is a Muslim, some others say that his parents were Brahmins. Let us not worry about his birth. Let us look at his teachings. They are different from what you find in Hindu religious texts.

There may not be anything wrong in non-Hindus such as Jesus or Allah or Shirdi Sai Baba, but we must do so consciously, because all are not same.

Christians claim their religion is the only true religion. Muslims too make similar claims. It is only Hindus who claim that their religion is same as other religions. Christians and Muslims are correct. Hindus are wrong. Every religion is different. Even Shirdi-Sai-Baba-ism too is different. You have the freedom to practise any religion you want, but please do it consciously.

When you worship Shirdi Sai Baba, please be aware that you have deviated from Hinduism. To that extent, you are a non-Hindu.

I do accept that what Swami Swarupananda said is in bad taste. But I urge all of you to take some essence out of his statements. That is, if you worship Shirdi Sai Baba, you are a non-Hindu at least to some extent. That is what the court judgments too say :-

http://indiankanoon.org/doc/1499064/

Suresh
July 29, 2014
Report Abuse
@senthil,

You are right, Senthil.

Governments can not touch mosques, churches and Shirdi Sai Baba temples, that is why some Hindus are building Shirdi Sai Baba temples to protect themselves from the SECULAR government authorities. To these Hindus, Shirdi Sai Baba serves as a mask for their own favourite Hindu Gods.

This conspiracy to suppress Hindus and Hinduism has been existent well before 1947. Christian missionaries wanted to spread Christianity in India, but these Hindu temples and Brahmins were some of the obstacles on their path. So, the British took over Hindu temples. I think "The Religious Endowments Act, 1863" is relevant to this.

Soon after India got independence in 1947, one of the first laws passed by the Indian government (or parliament?) was again about Hindu temples. Nehru was strongly against what he termed "Hindu revivalism". I think at that time Sardar Patel rebuilt Somnath temple in Gujarat.

There has been a deliberate conspiracy to suppress Hindus, especially Brahmins, and taking over Hindu temples is a part of this conspiracy. Brahmins have been successfully deprived of their livelihood and the ancient Brahmana system has been destroyed much to the glee of anti-Brahmins.

I do not know who is behind the Sai Baba cult. But, some innocent Hindus build Shirdi Sai Baba temples merely to protect themselves from being taken over by our SECULAR governments.






Suresh
July 29, 2014
Report Abuse
The only effective way of taking over of Hinduism is by eliminating the various 'Jaathis' in the society. Historically if we observe, these endogamous groups have been the main reason Hinduism has managed to withstand and survive almost 1000 years of onslaught.

According to our Shastras each Jaathi has special assigned responsibilities in the society along with the set duties which are common to all. Now Hinduism is what it today is only because at least a few Hindus are still doing at least some of their assigned karmas. One such example of this would be the reason behind the survival of many temples in TN (despite the Gov). The Nattukotai Chettys continue their traditional charities to support many temples, and the pujaris and gurukal who are still there to at least light the lamp each day.

Our Shastras clearly say that in order for us to achieve our goals (Dharma, Artha, Kama & Moksha), we have to do our duties, both specific & common. This is one of the core principle and differentiator of Hinduism.

Now if we look at many of the new age gurus (including Shiridi Sai Baba) - sure they do teach some aspects of Hinduism (Saamanya dharma), but they also downplay or undercut the role of Jaathi and therefore of Visheshya dharma. They probably do this to be politically correct to expand their following. So what this actually means is that they are teaching things which are against the Shastras, so this is no Hinduism at all. At best it may be called another version of an abrahamic religion which borrowed some symbols from Hinduism.

The day when most people in India do not know which Jaathi they belong to, we can say Hinduism has been vanquished. Unfortunately either knowingly or unknowingly these new age gurus are fast taking us there.
Shy
July 30, 2014
Report Abuse
Senthil,

today people want to earn money by constructing temples and w/o hard work. All scrupulous minds are mostly behind them.

However i met a gentlemen near chennai he is a devotee of sai baba for past 30 years and has constructed a beautiful sai temple . Vinayak is also there.In his temple all priests are brahmins. They do vaiddik agnihotra/havan etc. Once i spoke to him h said to me that the effect of ved mantras come in the surroundings when done regularly.


Senthil your point of kula achaar i understand but after reading vedas, careful study of scriptures and meeting a rishi i will prefer to follow vedas in personal life for upliftment of soul and upward journey.

Jaathi system is like association of different professional bodies gives them a code of conduct and moral rules , guidelines to follow unlike todays unethical/usurping bussiness families w/o morals(like bussiness standards)

We should learn to see our cultur with rfernc to Vedas, upnishad, ramayan mahabharat etc they ar our refernce points.
Rashmi
August 01, 2014
Report Abuse
All religions are connected with same spirituality. Let there be no discrimination in controlling institutions be government or not. Let us stop this heart burning that people want to earn money by constructing temples.
Dr Satya P.Bindra
August 01, 2014
Report Abuse