Modi: Political entrepreneur par excellence
by Sandhya Jain on 02 Jun 2015 19 Comments
From the moment he unveiled an enticing vision of growth before ambitious students at the capital’s prestigious Sri Ram College of Commerce in February 2013, effortlessly capturing the imagination of young India (and an awestruck national and international audience), Narendra Modi has straddled the nation like a colossus – a leader without a peer across the political arena. This is true even today, despite some attempts to portray a rebooted but robotic Rahul Gandhi as an equal challenger.

 

Unfortunately, Mr Modi’s first anniversary as Prime Minister has been caught in a pincer between abnormal rains and hailstorms that wreaked havoc on standing crops in northern and central India, causing acute grief to farmers (some died of heart attack, some committed suicide), and a severe heat wave that has taken over 2000 lives nationwide - grim evidence of climate change. These tragedies were followed by media-hyped unrest over one rank one pay for the armed forces, and an overall disparagement of the regime despite the Prime Minister’s private engagement with those he once derided as “news traders”.

 

Some Opposition leaders and commentators ridiculed the Prime Minister as a dream merchant. But Mr Modi is an ambitious leader; as Chief Minister he established Gujarat as an alluring destination for investment, creating jobs and wealth. As Prime Minister, his high profile foreign tours, with special outreach to the Diaspora, try to replicate this on the national plane.

 

Most importantly, emulating Franklin D Roosevelt during the Great Depression, Mr Modi has taken responsibility for the big ticket infrastructural investments (railways, roadways, metros, etc.) needed to fill the potholes of six decades of ineptitude, sloth, and corruption, and get the economy back on track. Unlike most analysts, he understands that Jawaharlal Nehru was right to seize the commanding heights of the economy once he realised that Indian industrialists did not have the stomach for large and long-term investments.

 

Where Nehru (and his heirs) erred was in perceiving a dichotomy between the public and private sector, when both could coexist. Instead, he created a gigantic bureaucracy and maze of laws that harassed industrialists in areas where they wished to invest and make honest profits. This spirit of official meanness penetrated every small and medium enterprise providing employment in cities and towns, and was most vicious in hounding the self-employed poor, such as street vendors.

 

While private business (small, medium, big) survived by greasing palms and the poor suffered the humiliation heaped on them, the real tragedy played out in the public sector. Despite huge investment of public funds, political interference and poor accountability resulted in lethargic performance, barring specific sectors such as nuclear energy. In a double whammy, well managed public sector units were often made to fail. In just the past decade, the highly profitable BSNL/MTNL accumulated huge losses, triggering motivated calls for their sale to private capitalists; yet when a private airline defaulted on loans to the tune of several crores of rupees, no one demanded seizure of company assets.

 

To combat this environment of economic gloom, the Prime Minister visited some of the major economies (and will tour others this year) to invite investments and tourists to trigger growth. The simplification of visas, including for China despite the irritant of stapled visas for Indians from Jammu & Kashmir and Arunachal Pradesh, is part of a larger design to lure foreigners to India.

 

The policy paralysis of previous years has ended. The endless negotiation for Rafale fighters was compacted into a government-to-government purchase of 36 planes and a ‘make in India’ component proposed for the rest of the aircraft (whenever required). Several policy measures have been rolled out, including raising the foreign equity cap in insurance, pension and defence sectors; for railways sky is the limit.

 

Genuine efforts have been made towards cooperative federalism by devolving more finances to States and inviting them to be equal partners in planning via the NITI Aayog. Auctioning of natural resources like coal mines and spectrum has been transparent. The Goods and Services Tax may roll out soon, and a Parliamentary panel is working to resolve conflict over the Land Acquisition Bill. Despite propaganda that the Centre is dragging its feet on the issue of black money, a Special Investigation Team was constituted soon after coming to power, new legislation mooted to detect money held abroad illegally, and foreign banks nudged to disclose Indian accounts. The issue was discussed with Maldives soon after Mr Modi’s swearing-in on May 26, 2014, and later at the G-20 summit in November 2014.

 

Mr Modi’s personal initiatives such as Swachh Bharat have resonated with citizens who are voluntarily cleaning up river ghats, water bodies, and public streets. The construction of toilets in schools (a major factor behind girl child dropouts) is being taken up across States. The Beti Bachao Beti Padhao movement to abolish female foeticide and promote education of the girl child is its natural corollary, as is the exhortation to families to plant trees at the birth of a girl child. Mr Modi is the first Prime Minister to fuse critical social reforms with his political mission.

 

Critics ignore the electrifying impact of the Jan Dhan Yojana; yet over 15 crore households have bank accounts with a life cover and a place to deposit their earnings. The pension scheme, the accident and life insurance schemes are appreciated by poor and middle class families who see the Prime Minister as a beacon of hope.

 

Certainly, there is disappointment that jobs have not materialised at grassroots level. Now, as a possibly deficit monsoon looms ahead, experts grudgingly admit that the economy depends on agricultural contribution to GDP, a truth they have been denying since liberalisation began in the 1990s. So our captions of industry who constantly hanker for incentives, loans, and cheap inputs, and never take the risks that are supposed to be the hallmark of private capital, will remain shy. The hope lies with new entrepreneurs.

 

This brief overview would be incomplete without a mention of alleged minority alienation. Here one may cite the influential Saudi columnist, Khalaf Al-Harbi, who recently described India as “the most tolerant nation” on earth, where despite phenomenal diversity of faiths and languages, “people live in peace and harmony”. Confessing envy “because I come from a part of the world which has one religion and one language and yet there is killing everywhere”, he said, “India remains the oldest and most important school to teach tolerance and peaceful co-existence regardless of the religious, social, political or ethnic differences”.  

User Comments Post a Comment
Sir, "Media-hyped unrest over one-rank-one-pay for the Armed Forces", Really ? Please consider the following.

The address of the then BJP (PM Designate) Modi to the Ex-Servicement at a rally in Rewari, Haryana on 15 Sep 2013 :

" Who stops our former soldiers to live with honour and self respect, and their genuine demands getting fulfilled? We have been hearing about one rank, one pension since many years, what is the problem..? Today I publically demand from the Government of India on behalf of the army men and ex-service men of this country, to publish a white paper on the status of 'one rank, one pension' scheme. And Friends, I am sure that if in 2004, Vajpayee Ji would have formed government, then today this problem of one rank one pension would not have been complicated..! Friends, people would have sat together and Atal Ji would have found a solution to this problem, and would have given our former servicemen live with pride and honour".

And then as the Prime Minister, at Siachen on 24 Oct 2014 :

" How many decades have passed without One Rank One Pension. It was in my destiny that One rank One pension has been fulfilled, and preparations were being made for a National War Memorial, that we could all be proud of. The government is committed to the cause.”

So, from 'my destiny that OROP has been fulfilled' to the present '“You have been patient for 40 years, wait for some more time. This is a complex issue... I promise we will hold discussions and resolve it”.

If that was not enough, the Defence Minister at the India Today Conclave had stated that OROP will be implemnted by end Mar 2015. This was later shifted to Apr 2015, and then to 13 May 2015 and then to 25 May 2015 and to the present of 'GOD ONLY KNOWS WHEN'.

And the Prime Minister and the Defence Minister want us 'JOE SUCKERS' Veterans to believe in their word, when their very credibility lies in TATTERS.

It is learnt that the case for OROP has left the Minister of Defence on 12 Mar 2015. Thereafter the volleyball game of the Babus has started !! It is reliably learnt that thefile has been tossed between the two Ministries five times !! It is also reliably learntthat the Defence Minister had shown a chart of the calculations for OROP amounting to Rs. 8297 crores,to a delegation of Ex Servicemen that had called on him in early Mar 2015.

An action oriented Govt with TRANSPARENCY !! INDEED, SIR !!

If all the preceding was not enough of Govt. 'dilly-dallying', The Committee on Petitions of Rajya Sabha under the Chairmanship of Shri Bhagat Singh Koshyari, MP,[BJP], presented its Hundred and Forty-second Report to the Rajya Sabha on 19th December, 2011 on the petition praying for grant of one rank one pension to the armed forces personnel.

Following are the some important recommendations of the Committee:-

- "The Committee has taken note of the fact that a sum of Rs.1300 crores is the total financial liability for the year 2011-12 in case OROP is implemented fully for all the defence personnel in the country across the board. The Committee was informed that out of this, 1065 crores would go to retirees belonging to Post Below Officer Ranks (PBOR) while the Commissioned Officers would be getting the remaining i.e. 235 crores. The Committee felt that 1300 crores is not a very big amount for a country of our size and economy for meeting the long pending demand of the armed forces of the country. The Committee understand that this 1300 crores is the expenditure for one year which might increase at the rate of 10 percent annually.Even if it is so, the Committee does not consider this amount to be high, keeping in view the objective for which it would be spent". (Para 11 of the Report)

- "The Committee was not convinced with the version of the Ministry of Finance that the grant of OROP to the defence personnel would eventually generate similar requests from the civilian work force of the country under the Central Government and the State Governments. The Committee feels so because of the quite different terms and conditions of service of the two different categories of employments. The terms and conditions of armed forces are tougher and harsher than the civilian Government employee. On the issue of returning of service medals by the defence personnel of our country to the President of India in view of the Governments' apathetic attitude towards their demand of grant of OROP, the Committee was of the view that our defence personnel should not feel alienated to this extent again and they are not forced to surrender their hard earned service medals in this manner to exhibit their discontent with the government policies". (Para 11.2 of the Report)

- The Committee also felt that the decision of the Government to bring our defence personnel on the pattern of the civilians with regard to their pay, pension, etc. (from Third Central Pay Commission onwards) is not a considered decision which has caused hardship to the defence personnel and has given birth to their demand for OROP. The Committee understand that before the Third Central Pay Commission, the defence personnel were getting their pay / pension on the basis of separate criteria unconnected with the criteria devised for the civilian work force. That criteria acknowledged and covered the concept of OROP which has been given up after the Third Central Pay Commission".(Para 11.4 of the Report)

And the Prime Minister wants us - veterans to be 'patient'. Brutus was also an Honourable man, Sir !!

Pertinent to mention here that OROP has been well defined by the Petitions Committee of the Rajya Sabha in its report. This has been accepted by Parliament. Not just that. The Interim Budget of UPA-2 and the First Budget of the current NDA Govts. had catered for OROP AND WAS PASSED BY THE RESPECTIVE LOK SABHA. It was also included in the President's address toboth houses of Parliament !!

After all this 'OROP IS A COMPLEX ISSUE' !! And, we are supposed to believe this hogwash !!

As I see it, this OROP imbroglio is a massive 'con game' played by the combine of Modi +Arun Jaitely + Manohar Parrikar. They got the veterans' votes in 2014, and it was 'Game - Set - and- Match' thereafter

Regret Dear Prime Minister - can't believe your words any longer.

And, for the record: I have returned my medals to the Supreme Commander in sheer disgust at the apathy of the Politico - Babudom for the Armed Forces.

R.I.P - OROP.

Regards
Capt. (retd) H.Balakrishnan, I.N.
June 02, 2015
Report Abuse
Good analysis,an informative article for the reader. I wish the author had dealt some aspects, like agriculture, in greater detail, where the Modi government needs to be extremely vigilant, lest the opposition take advantage to flog it and portray a negative image of the government, as is currently happening. With a merciless summer, and, an El Nino waiting in the wings to happen, the huge farmer community will look up to Modi for succour. Manipulating just the minimum support price (MSP) for food grains, and now, for pulses and oilseeds, as proposed by the Food and Consumers Affairs Minister Ram Vilas Paswan, is no true remedy for the maladies confronted by Indian agriculture. They are deep rooted and there is an urgent need, not just for arm chair economists not having a true understanding of the ground reality of Indian agriculture, for persons with a clear vision on Indian agriculture to participate in the deliberations of official bodies like NITI Ayog, which, most unfortunately, is not the case, as of now.
Professor K.P.Prabhakaran Nair
June 02, 2015
Report Abuse
I feel deeply for PM Modi and his Sarkar. What great expectations! Look at the line-up of folks who are watching how Modi Sarkar performs. Leaving aside the asinine opposition and their supporters, we have impatient, fiery ex-army men baying for OROP, we have agri-watchers waiting to pounce about GM and food price policy, and we have other sundry reluctant Modi admirers who are sure that they would do a great job of putting this country on track if only they were given the chance!

I likened Sushma Swaraj's press meet to a verbal annual performance review, to a couple of my colleagues. The response from one was: what did MOEA have to do? Modi went everywhere, no? SIGH. When I mentioned the Yemen rescue's details and the importance of being Indian on that foreign land, there was surprise...they did not know. We are all educated. We all have freedom to read at watch on TV what we want and form our opinions. Can we not exercise the freedom to cut some slack for a man with obvious good intentions for this country to do what he has promised to do? OROP will happen, Captain Sir. So will the agri policy get better. Just keep giving inputs to Modi Sarkar...they will do what it takes. Have faith. See, the glass as half full already. We are Indians, we have hope. We have chosen a man to set our country on the right path so that all our efforts are not filtered away to benefit some crooks. See the value in Sandhya Jain's analysis...it can only get better.
Sujata Srinath
June 02, 2015
Report Abuse
@Sujata, thanks. I wish I could have done more on foreign policy but 1050 words for one year was a tall order and I have written much on foreign policy elsewhere also.
I agree that Sushma Swaraj is one of the great successes of the Modi Sarkar
Sandhya Jain
June 02, 2015
Report Abuse
it is always a great pleasure to read Ms Sandhya ji Jain's articles. Crisply written and rich in informative contents. thanks, again.
Shilpy
June 02, 2015
Report Abuse
Excellent Sandhya
Uttam
June 02, 2015
Report Abuse
Love the 'rebooted' robotic! For this alone the article is a distinction.
Saraswati
June 02, 2015
Report Abuse
Dear Madam Sujatha Srinath,

I read your comments, and may I please assure you, in all humility, I am not one of those "sundry reluctant Modi admirers, who are sure that they would do a great job of putting this country on track if only they were given a chance" , nor one of the "agri-watchers to pounce about GM and food price policy". I truly admire the man, and, may I please assure you, again in all humility, my record in my specialisation , which is agriculture, is of the highest and impeccable global standards and, I am very well recognised all over the world for my contributions, unlike some who trot around as "scientists", but are, at best "manipulators". As for my stand on GM crops it is very clear (no hidden agenda unlike those who peddle them) and Sandhyaji knows it well. If I am not recognised, here in India, it is simply because, I refuse to be a sycophant, and a manipulator, if you understand what I mean. Thank you for reading these comments, I thought I should clear your ill placed doubts, in case you have any and are wary of expressing them openly, concerning my credentials
Professor K.P.Prabhakaran Nair
June 02, 2015
Report Abuse

Good summary on NaMo govt, long path ahead, beginning good in the given circumstances, working with a clear vision
krishnarjun
June 02, 2015
Report Abuse
Agree with the writer; nice round up
AK
June 02, 2015
Report Abuse
Thank you Sandhya for a beautiful article on the Vat Purnima full moon. Colossus is the right word. Modi is India’s man of destiny, after a 67-year drought. We needed this man of great dignity, also full of contradictions, just like our beloved nation and its people. He has given himself away, with a rare degree of selfless commitment, dedication and seriousness of purpose, while at the same time, light-heartedly flaunting his foibles literally on his sleeve with childlike enthusiasm and infectious joy. We love him like pater familias and are willing to be patient and forgiving for small mistakes here and there, just like we do within our families in India. No amount of media or opposition malevolence can dent his growing popularity around the world, as a long-awaited statesman who inspires and ignites our dreams once again. The brazenness of bungling scamsters – to whom we had gifted a long rope – broke our hearts and brought us shame on the world stage, and so Modi represents a refreshing change at this point in time. Today the nation is more alert and aware than the media imagines, and the miasma of disinformation and shrill invective doesn’t affect his growing hold over the imagination of the vast Indian populace across all divides. Also, the unity and singularity of purpose that he has woven into his hand-picked team is nothing short of a miracle.
Modi and Rahul Gandhi represent the Karan - Arjun divide as the ‘OBC chaiwala pretender’ and the milk-white shahzada with a massive ‘bearded jholawala-of-the-seventies’ complex. Unfortunately for him, the passionate diatribes against his nemesis who dared to snatch away his throne don’t somehow gel with the distinct zombie look he continues to project. Perhaps his image builders can microwave this wrinkle out of his persona soon enough. But one can’t help wonder what he makes of the suited-and-booted flair of the greatest dalit icon of all times—Ambedkar himself! Goes to show that Indians care more about substance and integrity than petty bourgeoisie narrow-mindedness in those whom they idolise!
A final word of cautious wisdom to the youthful RaGa, would be to tone down his vituperative attacks on Modi, which go against the quintessential Indian tradition of tehzeeb, or courtesy shown to elders, if he wishes to earn respect of the masses. It would be a good beginning. There are invisible lines that must not be crossed in parliamentary, political, or public discourse, which none of his anglophile or Italian advisers, media image-makers, family and friends seem to be aware of. He still has time to correct himself, should he wish for himself any long-term influence on the Indian national scene. Indians tend to be a forgiving lot, provided he is open to new learning about cultural sensitivities that are beyond the ken of tired old leftist or allegedly ‘liberal’ advisers .
Rudrapratap
June 02, 2015
Report Abuse
OROP is a very simplified way of defining the terms of pension fixation. For Family pensioners it was there already. There are genuine issues , the politicians are perhaps never briefed on that before they promise in good faith. The issues settled by the Armed forces tribunal and High courts and supreme courts which were never implemented by the Min of Defense in relation to pay and pensions are all to be accepted by the same bureaucracy which denied the benefits to the forces for the final OROP to be laid out as an algorithm to work out the entitled pension amount.The 33 years service for full pension is a case in point. Add to this the envy and jealousy reactions from the paramilitary forces side who though got benefits which are denied to the defence forces like NFFU (non functional financial upgradation )and assured carrier progression . All this to be agreed upon with the stake holders and realizing that there is no staff side in matters of anomaly resolution processes in the case of uniformed people in the defence ministry, it is a good progress that has been made on OROP front. Whatever decided on OROP again should not be altered by the 7th Pay commission hence more time to decide on OROP.
Ravi
June 02, 2015
Report Abuse
Dear Prof. K P P Nair,

I am sorry if you felt that my comment was directed towards you in particular. Let me assure you that I admire your stand on GM crops and truly find your advice to the agriculture ministry very well reasoned, although I don't profess to know much about agriculture. I am happy that you find PM Modi a sincere man. But that is not the case with many others. They are not ready to shift focus from what is yet to be done/achieved nor are they willing to acknowledge that there is a limit to what can be achieved in a year.

My comments were more of an observation of how even a good year by a new government can invite more brickbats than kudos from those who voted with very, very high expectations of the ground realities changing dramatically. Maybe PM Modi could have done some such cosmetic changes but perhaps his focus is more on putting systemic changes in place.

Regards,
Sujata Srinath
Sujata Srinath
June 02, 2015
Report Abuse
Excellent piece; the continued anti-Modi stand of main stream media (MSM) is unfortunate and has deprived millions of Indians info on the achievements to date; as the author has correctly pointed out, many uncertainties -e.g deficit monsoon - etc loom large and may delay employment generation - especially in rural India;
Naagesh
June 03, 2015
Report Abuse
The damage done by the previous Government cannot be undone fast. The incumbent Government has laid down clearly defined paths for economic revival, tackling corruption and having a faster decision-making mechanism. Social welfare schemes with a wide reach to the underprivileged and the middle-class go to prove that Prime Minister Narendra Modi wants to keep the interest of this segment on a priority.

As far as the corporate sector is concerned, it is not the responsibility of the Government to help businesses raise capital and draw out sustainable plans. It boils down to the Government deciding on a roadmap and being judicious in debt-raising exercises. The Government can help in clearing hurdles and streamlining policy framework and decision-making, which it is doing perfectly. We just need to be patient.
Balgovind
June 03, 2015
Report Abuse
Great article
Nihar
June 03, 2015
Report Abuse
Brilliant
Sanjeev
June 03, 2015
Report Abuse
Dear Shrimathi Sujatha Srinath,

I thank you for your kind words clarifying things. This is a belated response, I have been far too busy the last couple of days with many things academic

Warm regards,


Prabhakaran Nair
Professor K.P.Prabhakaran Nair
June 04, 2015
Report Abuse
Sandhyaji,
Hope you get Rajya Sabha Seat sooner from this Govt...

Present GOVT doesn't even deserved to be in power for even 1 Day.

Price of Tomato is 45 Rs/Kg in Hyderabad.....While during monsoon it used to be 10/Kg....Is that sellers are making GOOD Money?

Modiji's GM corps only will help reducing price of vegetables...
Jaykumar
June 13, 2015
Report Abuse