Children of a Lesser God?
by Sandhya Jain on 17 Oct 2017 15 Comments

The Supreme Court’s order of 9 October 2017, in Arjun Gopal and Others versus Union of India and Others (Writ Petition, Civil, No. 728 of 2015), banning the sale of fire crackers in Delhi and the National Capital Region (NCR) has set the cat among the pigeons.

 

As the order mentions “Diwali” in almost every paragraph, with a sprinkling of “Dussehra”, it is difficult to avoid the feeling that Hindu festivals are being selected and denuded of their joyous exuberance, in the name of higher good. Social media has listed restrictions on the height of Dahi Handi during Krishna Janmashtami, use of water during Holi, attempts to ban Jallikattu bull-hugging race in Tamil Nadu, and now ban on sale of crackers on Diwali eve, as instances of intolerance of Hindu culture. The judgement could cause losses to hundreds of shopkeepers across NCR to the tune of Rs. 1,000 crore.

 

Currently, air pollution in Delhi-NCR is being aggravated by burning thousands of tonnes of rice stubble in Punjab, Haryana, Rajasthan, and Uttar Pradesh. Other polluters include road dust, construction dust, vehicle emissions, municipal solid waste burning and diesel generator sets. At the time of writing, with Diwali five days away, pollution was at its zenith.

 

India’s rice stubble problem drew international attention in 2016 when the US National Aeronautics and Space Administration released a satellite image of fires across millions of hectares of fields in Punjab alone. Haryana and Punjab burn nearly 35 million tonnes of crop residue and contribute to half of Delhi’s air pollution. The National Green Tribunal noted that stubble burning boosts carbon dioxide levels in the air by 70 per cent and raises levels of carbon monoxide and nitrogen dioxide, triggering respiratory and heart problems.

 

Besides, the soil loses nitrogen, phosphorous, potassium and sulphur. Crop residue should be returned to the soil to increase organic carbon content, in situ moisture, and become manure. But most farmers avoid the labour and burn the stubble, which heats the land and kills soil microorganisms, affecting overall productivity.

 

However, marginal farmers in Panipat and Sonepat districts of Haryana have started using straw to make compost to grow mushrooms and earn healthy profits. In 2016, the Union Power Ministry asked the National Thermal Power Corporation to find solutions, including converting straw into briquettes that can be burnt in existing power plants. About 15 million tonnes of rice straw can be converted into 1,000 MW of electricity; rice-growing States produce 130 million tonnes of straw; some is used as animal feed, some sold to brick kilns and the paper and packaging industry, but the majority is burnt. But recently, in Patiala district, Punjab, a power company harvested and collected the straw itself and generated 12 MW, while farmers saved time and labour and earned some cash. With eight more biomass power plants slated to come up in Punjab, some solutions may emerge.

 

Briefly, Arjun Gopal and Others sought wide ranging reliefs against the use of fireworks (including crackers), prevention of harmful crop burning, dumping of malba (construction waste) and other steps towards environmental purity, and sought interim relief in the matter of fireworks on grounds of worsening air quality in Delhi-NCR due to extensive use of fireworks and fire crackers during Diwali 2014.

 

However, ignoring the on-going problem of crop residue burning, the bench comprising Judges A.K. Sikri, Abhay Manohar Sapre and Ashok Bhushan decided that snapping the supply chain of fireworks was the more practical way of addressing the menace, instead of banning the burning the crackers by individuals which would be difficult to monitor and enforce.

 

Asserting the duty of the State to ensure a healthy environment in terms of Article 48A of the Constitution of India and the matching duty of citizens under Article 51A(g), the Court upheld the “precautionary principle” which mandates that where there are threats of serious and irreversible damage, lack of scientific certainty should not be invoked to postpone measures to prevent environmental degradation. In these circumstances, the Court had passed an interim relief order on November 11, 2016.

 

When the manufacturers of fire crackers and licence holders applied for modification of the interim order, the Court noted that air pollution in Delhi-NCR worsened due to fireworks during Diwali days in 2016. The order of September 12, 2017 admitted that from the material before the Court, it was impossible to state with certainty that the extremely poor quality of air in Delhi in November and December 2016 was the result only of bursting fireworks around Diwali. But the Court argued that Delhi Police had issued a large number of temporary licences in 2016 and a similarly large number could be assumed to have been issued in NCR, which require regulation.

 

Hence, the appeals of the manufacturers and licence holders were dismissed; it was pointed out that nearly two decades ago, the CPCB had stated that Sulphur should not be permitted in fireworks as it produces the extremely toxic Sulphur Dioxide on combustion. The Board was directed to carry out further studies on the harmful effects of materials used in manufacturing fireworks.

 

The CPCB was directed to set safety limits of various constituents used in fireworks for setting standards for ambient air quality while bursting fireworks. The Court appointed a Committee of experts headed by Chairperson, CPCB, to submit its report on or before 31 December 2017. The CPCB is responsible for much of the present crisis as it failed to fulfill the Supreme Court order of November 11, 2016 to prepare a report on the harmful effects of materials used in fireworks, within three months.

 

The Court accepted the petitioners’ plea that the suspension of licences should be tested for positive effect during Diwali 2017. Thus, despite the dangerous levels of pollution well in advance of Diwali, and despite lack of empirical data regarding causes of air pollution in the capital, it suspended temporary licences to shopkeepers to ensure that there are no sales of crackers in Delhi-NCR. It is difficult to understand what baseline will be adopted to measure the pollution on and after Diwali.

 

The Supreme Court order strays into the realm of public policy, which is the domain of government. By banning the sale but not use of crackers, the Court has created a bizarre situation and triggered public rage, with angry pledges to burst more crackers to protest the embargo. Barring the Shiv Sena, political parties have been passive in the face of this cultural euthanasia, though the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh has expressed displeasure.

User Comments Post a Comment
" The feeling that Hindu festivals are being selected and denuded of their joyous exuberance in the name of a higher good is widespread on social media". It is "TRUE" 100%. After all, we're supposedly "NEHRUVIAN SECULAR', STUPID !! What beats me is since when has the Supreme Court arraigned to itself 'TO MAKE LAWS' ? I was taught in Civics at school : The Legislature - Legislates ; The Executive - Implements the Law and The Judiciary - Interprets the Law. But here we have the Supreme Court enacting LAWS
from ;'A to Z", and interfering in affairs of National Security which can spell DISASTER for the Nation. Time the Judiciary was told -LOUD & CLEAR - "LIE OFF". Happy Deepavali
H.Balakrishnan
October 17, 2017
Report Abuse
Such a meticulously-presented argument that clinches the fact that Hindu festivals are being targeted! Is it because of our liberal stance that overlooks every insinuation and attack against our rituals and traditions?
Renuka Dhar
October 17, 2017
Report Abuse
A meticulously argued piece. Also provides info on various aspects of pollution in Delhi, plus the practice of burning rice stubble. One wonders whether this is a recent practice by farmers.

However, the Deepavali crackers question is a tough one.
Dr. Vijaya Rajiva
October 17, 2017
Report Abuse
I happened to be in Delhi during Diwali of 2016. The air was sooo polluted and smelled of cracker bursting even in the early morning. One could taste the pollution of air when after yawing one closed one's mouth. This pollution would have been experienced by every one without exception i.e. including the judges. The appliance most displayed at appliance shops in Delhi is no more mixer grinder or fan . It is Air purifiers. I am least surprised at the ruling by the supreme court.
Ravindra
October 17, 2017
Report Abuse
The bigger problem is the unconstitutional collegium judiciary doing judicial overreach. SC has ignored the vehicular and construction related pollution. When a technical issue needs to be decided, there has to be technical jury instead of our lawyer turned judges who do not have technical background.

Deepavali happens only once a year, what about daily ear splitting early morning 4.30am azaan calls which disturb everyone's sleep ?
C Prabhu
October 17, 2017
Report Abuse
In the past there used to be crackers but of an eco-friendly nature. The problem is with too many harmful chemicals being used for tall gains by selfish manufacturers.

Court should also take stick on the people who are responsible for finding more eco-friendly materials for producing crackers. Court is trying to follow shortcuts instead of attacking at other bigger and continuous problems.
Narasimhan
October 18, 2017
Report Abuse
Cremation of corpses is thousands of years old. The SC is poking its nose everywhere
Kumar
October 18, 2017
Report Abuse
One is forced to say that the Apex Court has succumbed to the influence of the left liberals
Alok
October 18, 2017
Report Abuse
Congratulations for this article. I totally agree that such bans distort the social fabric.

On sulphur and sulphur di oxide, who stopped the CPCB from proposing standards?
Ramnivas
October 18, 2017
Report Abuse
This is a most ludicrous order from the Supreme Court
Som
October 18, 2017
Report Abuse
A must read, totally agree with the writer
Uma
October 18, 2017
Report Abuse
"Cultural euthansia" is a most apt description
Manisha
October 18, 2017
Report Abuse
I wrote at the time Ganapati festival. And is applicable now as well. "The disproportionate and deliberately incessant attempt at focusing on Ganes murtis and colour paints, makes one wonder about this disproportionate passion. Especially when one walks around busy streets, shops and business, one cannot miss the exuberant,
extravagant splash of striking strong colours of ads, magazines, newspapers, cinema posters and so on. Let alone such daily waste from other 'economic' activities. Honesty and transparency demands explanation of these everyday spectacle by the "activists" who are targeting Ganesha every year, year after year, though only once a year."
Swarup
October 19, 2017
Report Abuse
The main problem is the packing of large no of people in to small area, (in the name of urbanisation)..

In small towns and villages, the firecrackers do not cause much pollution, as people live scattered, and population density very low..

In metros , population density is high..

The issue is more than just firecrackers. We have to question the fundaemntals and logic of urbanisation.. NO HIndu intellectual has every questioned this, and has been blindly accepting the popular propoganda of "Urbanisation = development" stupidity.. they dont realise that urbanisation is a ploy to enslave vast amount of people by moving them far away from their means of survival (Food, milk, vegetables, water etc).. so that these masses will always depend upon govt for their basic needs that they cannot protest against any of govt's atrocities or political parties corruption..

When the Hindu intellegentsia has kept themselves ignorant and without any vision, why blame the enemies for attacking us? We dont need piece meal reactions from hindu organisations..

Pollution is a real problem in metros, but banning fireworkers is not the right solution.. what is the alternate way?
senthil
October 20, 2017
Report Abuse
More and more bizarre Orders are coming out of the wise "High and Supreme" Court in India these days. Some of them are outright dangerous for the country an society in the medium and long run.

Rohingya Case admission with some foolish obiter dicta, the Kolkata HC Stay on the re-deployment of Central Armed Police force; the notorious and outrageous Order to the Delhi Police, of the Delhi HC on underground drain covers in the NCR...!

Verbosity and irrelevant content contributing to too many tiresome pages, is another matter altogether.

Is it not time for some frank and informed criticism of our higher courts not only in English but in some of our national languages?
RVN
October 20, 2017
Report Abuse