Looking ahead without fear
by Sandhya Jain on 08 Jan 2019 15 Comments

A prime ministerial interview is an occasion for the incumbent to address his constituents, not an opportunity for critics to extract their pound of flesh. In an interview to news agency ANI, Narendra Modi tackled a range of issues with finesse. Deflecting charges of corruption in the Rafale deal, Modi made the subtle distinction that the allegations were not against him, but his government; “If there is any allegation against me personally, let them dig who gave what, when and where and to whom”.

 

This is a gentle dare to Congress president Rahul Gandhi to find a link to Modi; the Bofors kickbacks trail led directly to Sonia Gandhi crony Ottavio Quattrocchi, whose London bank accounts were unfrozen by the UPA government to allow him to withdraw the money. The Rs 30,500 crore offset deal with Dassault, under which the Defence Research and Development Organisation, Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd., and nearly 70 private firms will manufacture varied equipment, lacks similar resonance. Modi pressed the point mildly, “What is the need for middlemen in defence deals? … Had Make in India been initiated 70 years back, the malai khane wala raasta from outside would have been closed”.

 

Modi expanded on the surgical strikes: “When Uri happened, when our jawans were killed, burnt... there was rage within me… I realised that the anger in the Army was much more than mine. For the morale of the forces, they somehow wanted justice to be done …” Thus the operation was planned. “I gave clear orders that whether you get success or failure, don’t think about that, but come back before sunrise”. Revealing that he was in live contact that whole night, he said there were anxious moments when the flow of information stopped for an hour after sunrise, until he was finally told the men had returned safely. Thereafter, Pakistan was informed, the Cabinet Committee on Security met, and an Army officer briefed the nation.

 

Denying his government or party politicised the issue, Modi countered that the very same day, “leaders of some parties raised doubts over the surgical strikes. It was necessary for Pakistan to speak like this to keep their morale intact. But what Pakistan was saying, was being said here too…. Politicisation started from that point”.

 

Regarding overtures to then Pakistani Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif and congratulatory message to Imran Khan, Modi said India, be it UPA or NDA, favours dialogue, but talks are inconsistent with cross-border terrorism. Dismissing criticism of his foreign trips, he said all prime ministers have similar travel schedules because of the numerous multilateral forums; “If the level is lower than PM, the voice is not heard… I try that India’s voice reaches the world… My visits are noticed because I interact with people and take decisions”.

 

Combative over allegations that his government has weakened institutions, Modi charged that the previous government created the National Advisory Council against the Prime Minister and PMO; a Cabinet decision was torn up by a big leader (read Rahul Gandhi) at a press conference; judges were selected on the basis of ideology, and many Reserve Bank of India Governors forced out before completion of their terms. However, when his government learnt of the bickering in the Central Bureau of Investigation, the top two officials were asked to go on leave. He insisted Urjit Patel resigned for personal reasons.

 

Denying charges of vendetta raids, Modi hinted at the Sohrabuddin judgement where the Supreme Court observed that the case seemed tailored to implicate political leaders. The Enforcement Directorate secured a “razdaar” from a foreign country, and a Congress worker turned up as Christian Michel’s lawyer. Nirav Modi, Mehul Choksi, and Vijay Mallya fled because tolerance for their activities ended, but international laws are being invoked to bring them back, and their property is being seized even in foreign countries. While those who absconded under previous regimes have not returned, Modi promised, “those who fled during this government, they will be brought back… Those who have stolen India’s money, they will have to compensate for each and every penny”.

 

Modi said he was the first to raise the issue of black money and banking havens at the G20; this was accepted as a serious concern and a source of terror funding; nations agreed to share information. While many well-connected accused are moving freely, he remarked, “those considered first family, who ran the country for four generations, are out on bail, that too for financial irregularities. It is a big thing... The country’s former Finance Minister is making rounds of courts…”

 

On the generally clubbed issues of Ram temple, triple talaq and Sabarimala, the Prime Minister said the Ordinance was a response to the Supreme Court verdict; triple talaq is an issue of justice and is banned in most Islamic countries; while Sabarimala temple has its own traditions, just as there are temples where men cannot go. Moreover, “a woman judge in the Supreme Court has made certain observations..… There should be a debate on that as well sometimes”. As for Ayodhya, the matter is at its final stage in the Supreme Court. Urging Congress party lawyers not to create obstacles, he promised that once the judicial process ends, “whatever be our responsibility as government, we are ready to make all efforts”.

 

Regarding Congress promises of loan waivers for farmers, Modi said these have failed to resolve the farm crisis; farmers have to be saved from incurring debt in the first place. On opposition plans for a grand alliance, he said parties with no national agenda were uniting on a single agenda of opposing him (Modi). On Uddhav Thackeray’s criticisms, he said the BJP adhered to coalition dharma in 2014 when it won its own majority, and he was committed to giving space to regional aspirations.

 

Modi condemned lynch mobs in the name of cow protection and the political violence in which BJP workers have been killed in West Bengal, Kerala, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Assam, and Jammu and Kashmir. On Ganga, he said a drain polluting the river for 120 years has been closed and the next step is to cleanse the tributaries that drain into the river. The Prime Minister answered questions on all important and current issues; in the run up to the polls, as in 2014, more televised interviews can be expected.

 

(The writer is Senior Fellow, Nehru Memorial Museum and Library; the views expressed are personal)

User Comments Post a Comment
Nicely and carefully argued. It mirrors not only the reality of the Modi government's 5years of governance, it reflects his quiet confidence.
Dr. Vijaya Rajiva
January 08, 2019
Report Abuse
Comprehensive and dignified. He did not use it to engage in personal attack Like Rahul Gandhi has been doing.But Modi is a seasoned statesman while Rahul is an immature spoiled brat who thinks the world owes him a free ride for life.
Navaratna Rajaram
January 08, 2019
Report Abuse
First sentence -

Who are his constituents? Will "gentle dares" get him the votes? Eventually that's what really counts. He's already lost the Rajya Sabha.
Bharati
January 08, 2019
Report Abuse
Data packed presentation.Contemplative narration.But PM Modi ji should be cautious of leftists of various schools who have spread their net everywhere. They fueled the long march and caste riots in MP, Rajasthan and elsewhere.He should be aware of lotus subterfuges.
B.S.Harishankar
January 08, 2019
Report Abuse
Logically expressed points.
Prerna
January 08, 2019
Report Abuse
Good sum up of the interview
Suraj
January 08, 2019
Report Abuse
Superb article. Reinforces my faith in Modi.
Rama
January 08, 2019
Report Abuse
Good recount.Modi's critics want him to "face" the Presser with scores of persons asking all kinds of questions.RG has even challenged him to do so.Modi should accept this challenge and open one more avenue to communicate with people who matter.
This one to one system has several advantages for a leader to communicate,clarify,counter. It is the best way to communicate to cadres and supporters.It is also the best way to send messages to other countries.[ He did that for Pakistan in this interview].
Jitendra Desai
January 08, 2019
Report Abuse
A dispassionate, detailed and unbiased analysis of the recent ANI interview with PM Modi
Renuka
January 09, 2019
Report Abuse
Excellent article
Kiran
January 09, 2019
Report Abuse
Modi is by all means the best PM we have ever had. The only one I would compare with him is Sri Lal Bahadur Sastri, though he died under mysterious circumstances and the beneficiary of his death was Indira fraud Gandhi.

Having said that I too share the fear whether his soft pedaling the crimes of the dynasty would actually serve him or backfire. Though I would suspect every citizen who votes for scamgress, the fact remains that they have come back to power in three major states. I only hope the electorate understands the need for Modi to continue as PM at least for another two terms so that the nation is on a firm course to its much deserved elite position in the comity of nations.
P M Ravindran
January 09, 2019
Report Abuse
Congrats to Sandhyaji, for projecting India's PM, Sri Narendra Modiji's political and diplomatic skills at the national and international level. Restraint of speech, reveals the restraint of mind. The restraint shown by Modiji in his speeches can never be compared with those leaders of the Congress and other opposition parties.
So far as surgical strike and defence deals are concerned, the Congress is more worried in defending themselves and their defence related scams. Security of the country is least important,as revealed in the undue delay in finalising the Rafale deal.
Both China and Pakistan have realised that they are now facing a diplomatic, but very strong leader.
Panikkath krishnanunni
January 09, 2019
Report Abuse
Forget interviews, Modi has sealed the fate of the opposition in 2019.
Gary
January 09, 2019
Report Abuse
Despite being a Modi supporter, I agree with many such Hindus that the Modi government has been disappointing in promoting H aspirations. He spoke briefly about Sabarimala in a diplomatic way; there would have been no Sabarimala issue if his govt. had amended the constitution and provided the H with the same freedoms as Christians and Muslims to manage their places of worship. This would have taken the govt. out of the temples and prevented the state govts, from terrorizing the tantris and pujaris. This amendment would not in any way impact on the freedom of other religions and so there would be no opposition from them, the liberals and leftists. During these five years the M govt. could have done this or the changes to RTE to provide a level playing field for the H. Sorry, I am not enthused by his speech; I thought he was playing to the international leaders and not to his H constituency which voted him to power.
Govindan
January 09, 2019
Report Abuse
image making interview!
Expect many more to come in coming days!
jaykumar
January 09, 2019
Report Abuse