Squaring the circle: US challenges China on Xinjiang
by James M Dorsey on 07 Apr 2019 0 Comment

A draft US resolution that would designate a Pakistani militant as a global terrorist threatens to be China’s, and possibly Pakistan’s showdown at the OK Corral. The draft is supported by Britain and France. The resolution, if formally tabled in the full United Nations Security Council, could force China to justify its ten-year long blocking of efforts to designate Masood Azhar, the head of Jaish-e-Mohammed, the UN designated Pakistani group believed to be responsible for last month’s suicide attack in Indian-administered Kashmir. Some 40 Indian paramilitary personnel died in the attack that briefly brought Pakistan and India to the brink of war.

 

China earlier this month [March-ed] blocked a French draft resolution presented to the council’s 1267 committee, saying it needed more time to study evidence against Mr. Azhar. Known as the Al-Qaida Sanctions Committee, the committee was established on the basis of Security Council resolution 1267 adopted in 1999 to create a sanctions regime for Al Qaida and the Taliban. China has in the past said there was insufficient proof to list the Pakistani militant. In response to the US draft, China’s foreign ministry said this week that a “comprehensive and thorough” assessment was needed before blacklisting Mr. Azhar.

 

The United States, by circulating the draft weeks after the failed French attempt, is in effect saying that China can no longer buy time. The US draft amounts to an effort to put on public display seeming contradictions in Chinese as well as Pakistani policy. To be sure, China, as a permanent Security Council member, is likely to veto the US draft if it were to be put to the vote. The veto, however, would put to rest Chinese assertions that Beijing had so far not vetoed Mr. Azhar’s blacklisting but “put a hold on the application” to promote “proper settlement of the issue through dialogue.”

 

The Chinese position was supported by Pakistan’s UN ambassador, Maleeha Lodhi, who cautioned that the Security Council’s terrorism sanctions regime and the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), an international anti-money laundering and terrorism finance watchdog, should not be used by powers as a tool to score geopolitical points. Ms. Lodhi was pointing fingers at the United States but stopped short of explicitly mentioning it. “Pakistan has been the principal victim of terrorism, including that supported, sponsored and financed from abroad. But this has not diminished my country’s resolve to eliminate this scourge,” Ms. Lodhi insisted.

 

Pakistan’s support of Chinese obstruction of Mr. Azhar’s designation casts however a further shadow over the Islamabad government’s so far unsuccessful efforts to convince FATF that it is addressing the group’s criticism. FATF has threatened to put the South Asian state on its blacklist. FATF’s regional affiliate, the Asia/Pacific Group on Money Laundering, this week [March-ed] took Pakistan to task for its allegedly weak implementation of measures against proscribed groups. A failure to satisfactorily address FATF concerns could impact Pakistan’s application for a financial aid package from the International Monetary Fund (IMF).

 

Pakistan denies Indian claims that Jaish-e-Mohammed is one of several militant groups supported by the Pakistani military. Pakistan says it has intensified its crackdown on militants in the wake of the Kashmir attack. The government announced earlier this month that it had taken control of 182 religious schools and detained more than 100 people, including Mr. Azhar’s brother, as part of its push against banned groups such as Jaish-e-Mohammed. In response, Mr. Azhar has denied government claims that he was seriously ill, ridiculed the government’s assertion that it was truly cracking down and warned that the crackdown would spark jihad across South Asia. He also goaded India in his regular column in Jaish-e-Mohammed’s Al-Qalam weekly. “India’s brain is not working. They are trying to threaten us. But are their threats making us scared? Certainly not. In fact, their threats encourage us. Their threats do the same trick as public appreciation does for a poet reciting his poetry,” Mr. Azhar wrote.

 

China, perhaps inadvertently, helped increase pressure on Pakistan to meet FATF’s requirements by voting this week in favour of a Security Council resolution that criminalizes funding of political violence and demands that all countries establish legal frameworks to counter the practice. The US draft could put China in the difficult position of having to square its shielding of Mr. Azhar with its effort to convince the international community that its brutal crackdown on Turkic Muslims in the troubled north-western province of Xinjiang is key to its fight against political violence.

 

China asserted in a white paper published this month that its counterterrorism policies in Xinjiang that amount to a frontal attempt to alter Islamic practices and involve the incarceration of up to one million people in re-education camps dubbed vocational training facilities were producing results. The paper claimed that the policies were in accordance with the rule of law and protecting human rights.

 

“Hundreds of thousands and possibly millions of Uyghurs are held against their will in so-called re-education camps where they’re forced to endure severe political indoctrination and other awful abuses,” US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said in a speech in Washington on Friday. Mr. Pompeo was speaking after meeting with a former detainee, Mihrigul Tursun, and three other Uyghur activists. Ms. Tursun has spoken publicly about allegedly being abused and tortured in detention.

 

The meeting and Mr. Pompeo’s remarks came against the backdrop of moves in the US Congress to out Chinese companies that facilitate the crackdown in Xinjiang. Major US institutional investors have recently divested from Hikvision, the world’s largest surveillance company that provides technology used in Xinjiang’s re-education camps.

 

China’s predicament in squaring its protection of Mr. Azhar with the justification of its crackdown is unlikely to crack the Muslim world’s wall of silence about what is happening to their Chinese brethren. Western pressure on China threatens to strike closer to home. To their credit, Pakistani prime minister Imran Khan and Indonesian president Joko Widodo have refrained from following in the footsteps of Saudi crown prince Mohammed bin Salman and Kazakh foreign minister Beibut Atamkulov as well as the Organization of Islamic Conference that all have endorsed China’s crackdown.

 

But Mr. Khan’s repeated assertion over a period of months that he lacks information or knows nothing about the situation in Xinjiang even if scores of Pakistani nationals have complained about the disappearance of spouses and other relatives is wearing thin. Pakistani businessmen travelling last September to Beijing to petition for the release of their wives was headline news. Mr. Khan’s insistence that “I haven't heard about that” is hardly a sustainable position.

 

Courtesy

https://mideastsoccer.blogspot.com/2019/03/squaring-circle-us-challenges-china-on.html

User Comments Post a Comment
nice article, the issue should be settled amicably. Muslims respecting hindu sentiments on Ayodhya would create lot of goodwill between both communities
krishnarjun108
April 05, 2016
Report Abuse
Professor B.R.Grover has done a great job. Thanks for the nice column Sandhyaji.
B R Haran
April 05, 2016
Report Abuse
A very incisive and pragmatic article for which Sandhya Jain deserves praise and laurels. The solution offered is very practical, if the Muslim leaders agree to bring closure to this centuries old dispute.

Ram Ohri
Ram Ohri
April 05, 2016
Report Abuse
Well said - Islamic law does not sanction creation of a mosque on an occupied site. As the Babri mosque was erected on the ruins
Samita
April 05, 2016
Report Abuse
A very sensible article
Balaji
April 05, 2016
Report Abuse
An eminently reasonable argument, for us kaffirs. For momins, "reason" is what the Koran requires of them. And the Koran certainly sees no reason to oblige us idolaters whom it describes quite explicitly as "the worst of created beings" (98.6).
Bharati
April 05, 2016
Report Abuse
Excellent article
Jyoti
April 05, 2016
Report Abuse
No one said it better.
Deepak
April 05, 2016
Report Abuse
The issue should be settled amicably. Muslims respecting hindu sentiments on Ayodhya would create lot of goodwill between both communities
Vijaya
April 05, 2016
Report Abuse
The three judge panel of SC reviewed the report of Archaeological Survey of India and saw the truth mentioned in this article. They were supposed to give judgement. Two judges were in favor to publish the truth, but one Muslim Judge objected.

Then, the report and judgement were swept under the rug by the UPA Congress to appease their vote bank. Need to shed the light on this topic. Who has knowledge?
Premolal
April 05, 2016
Report Abuse
If Ayodhya is resolved amicably, our 'SICK-U-LARISTS' will have to queue up in front of the various employment exchanges !!
H Balakrishnan
April 05, 2016
Report Abuse
A good detailed report on the book by Professor Grover. The case for Ayodhya has gotten stronger. Whether the mullahs and other elements will allow for the vacation of the site remains to be seen.
Dr. Vijaya Rajiva
April 05, 2016
Report Abuse
V good narrative. Things will change for sure but slowly. People, including Muslims, are very accommodative . Politicians and conservative religious leaders do not want the issue to be settled.
Nirmala
April 06, 2016
Report Abuse
Muslims should on their own accord withdraw from temple land. If their God is the only god (as they say) then there must be no reason for them to worry about temple
CS
April 06, 2016
Report Abuse
Sandhya ji
Thank you very much for this beautifully written article
Thanks a lot for paying the homage to my Uncle.
Anju Grover Chaudhary
April 06, 2016
Report Abuse
This is time for saner elements among Muslim leadership to come forward and hand over the place to Hindus.Other than small minority of Muslim leadership and few die hard seculars, very few Muslims could have interest in prolonging this affair.
Jitendra Desai
April 06, 2016
Report Abuse
Shia waqf board has kept itself out of this conflict earning goodwill of Hindus. It is Sunni Muslims who don't offer namaz in mosques built by Shias are keeping pot boiling on instigation by anti-harmony forces.
O P Gupta
April 07, 2016
Report Abuse
The Muslims living in Bharat are all from Hindu ancestors that were largely compelled to convert to Islam. They still have Hindu blood in their veins and their culture is Bharatiya only.

I feel they are not likely to have much opposition to the suggestion of Ms Jain
Mukund
May 05, 2016
Report Abuse