Americans’ Moby Dick
by Michael Brenner on 14 Sep 2021 6 Comments

Captain Ahab’s obsessive hunt for Moby Dick was driven by the thirst for revenge. The great white whale had maimed Ahab – in soul as well as body. Ahab was consumed by the passion to restore his sense of self, to regain his prowess and make himself whole again, by killing his nemesis – a compulsion that his wooden leg never let weaken.

 

America’s “war-on-terror” became our national mission for restoration. The psychic wound of 9/11 is what grieves us; it inflames our collective passion for vengeance. The physical wound is already healed. By now, it must be memorialized in order for the scar to be seen - and we want it to be seen, to feel it. It never did impair our functioning. In that sense, little more than a broken toe. In the aftermath of 9/11, there was genuine fear of a repeat attack – something that we now know never was in the cards. Our enemy has been emasculated; the great Satan was shot dead in Abbottabad long ago. Only pinpricks at long intervals from within our midst draw blood. 

 

Catharsis has eluded us, though. We still seethe with emotions – most below the surface, most of the time. We suffer from the embedded anxiety that is dread, from uneasy feelings of vulnerability, from a seeming lost prowess and control. A society that talks casually about ‘closure’ on almost all occasions cannot find closure on 9/11. Instead, it has a powerful need to ritualize the fear, to pursue the implacable quest for ultimate security, to perform violent acts of vengeance that neither cure nor satiate: Saddam, Gaddafi, al-Baghdadi, Suleiman. 

 

So, we prowl the seven seas hunting for monsters to slay; not Moby Dick himself, but his accessories, accomplices, enablers, facilitators, emulators, sympathizers. Whales of every species, great and small, fall to our harpoons. The dead and innocent dolphins far outnumber them. Fortunes of war.

 

Since there is no actual Moby Dick out there to pursue, we have fashioned a virtual game of acting out the hunt, the encounter, the retribution. We thereby have embraced the post-9/11 trauma rather than exorcised it. That is the “war-on-terror.” That war is about us – it no longer is about them. It is our Passion Play. The psycho-drama unspools in our own minds and imagination.

 

Ahab destroyed himself, destroyed his crew, destroyed his ship. He sacrificed all in the quest – a quest for the unattainable. The United States is sacrificing its principles of liberty, its political integrity, the trust that is the bedrock of its democracy, its standing in the world as the “best hope of mankind,” and its capacity to feel for others – including its fellow citizens. America’s Moby Dick has migrated and transmuted itself. It now is lodged in our innermost being. 

 

There, it spawns fictive offspring – foremost, Vladimir Putin. Now, China too. But the phantasmagoric ‘Putin’ is but the projection of our own existential dread. The spectral persona who haunts our minds, “Putin” has no objective existence. “Putin” is the creation of our troubled national psyche. We have transposed onto him the whole maelstrom of turbid emotions we had imparted to Osama bin-Laden, and then the Islamic State. ‘Putin’, like depictions of Satan, is the dark star amidst a host of demonic furies: Iran, Assad, the Taliban, Hezbullah, Houthis, Hamas, M-13. 

 

To be rid of America’s transmuted Moby Dick we must kill part of our tainted being – a form of psycho-political chemotherapy. Otherwise, our national soul will wither away just as Ahab was sucked into the ocean depths entangled in the very ropes he had fashioned to ensnare Moby Dick.  

 

In a bizarre twist on this modern-day retelling of the Ahab tale, Washington has substituted these devils for the original Moby Dick. Most bizarre, the U.S. has aligned itself with Al-Qaida in Syria (aka al-Nusra?, aka Jabhat Fatah al-Sham, aka Hayat Tahrir al-Sham) for the past eight years – rebranding the terrorist movement “moderate” Islamists. To this day, it collaborates with Turkey to protect the thousands of fighters, congregated in the Idlib pocket, from final elimination by the Syrian National Army operating with Russian air support.

 

Indeed, we have tacitly given our approval to Erdogan to extract many of them before dispatching them to Azerbaijan and Libya. It has precedent.* After all, for a decade Washington has turned a blind eye to Turkey’s critical role in facilitating the transit/ organization/ supply of ISIS elements into Syria/Iraq and, after their defeat, sheltering substantial numbers before expediting their deployment in Afghanistan where they have provided one of the two key elements in ISIS-K – useful for challenging the Taliban; and, as we’ve seen, remaining a terrorist force to be reckoned with there. Some of those transnational jihadis were allowed to escape from Raqqa by a calculated decision taken in Washington. 

 

How do we explain these contradictions, these self-defeating perverse acts? Realpolitik – Russia in Syria has displaced Islamo-terrorism on our priority rankings? Heavy pressure by our long-term ‘partner’ – and by our new ‘flame’ in Riyadh? Whatever the mix of proximate motives at play, those actions are at odds with our original obsession with the threat of Islamic terrorism. At one level it bespeaks confused thinking and incoherent strategy. At another level, it confirms the dissonant state of the country’s governing elites (and political class, in general) whose obsessive focus on the white whale has so distorted its mind and emotions that the object of its compulsions can shift kaleidoscopically as we blindly seek some target whose destruction will calm America’s inner turmoil.

 

Thrashing about this way, we are fated to fail – as we already have, ignominiously, four times in the Greater Middle East (five, including the Yemen atrocity). Frustration might lead us to strike out recklessly – to attack Iran, provoke Russia, confront China. Only humiliation or disaster awaits us if we do. Or, we could recoil upon ourselves with pent-up emotions turned against each other, as already has begun to occur.  

 

[* Joe Biden gave the game away when speaking at Harvard in October 2014 by candidly taking to task Turkey, Saudi Arabia and the UAE for their aid and support of jihadi groups in Syria. He was chastised by Obama for impetuously telling the truth and, within 48 hours, forced to make public apologies to all three governments. Over the ensuing seven years, I have seen only one or two references to this damning admission.

Joe Biden apologised over IS remarks, but was he right? - BBC News

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-29528482]

User Comments Post a Comment
Comments are free. However, comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate material will be removed from the site. Readers may report abuse at  editorvijayvaani@gmail.com
Post a Comment
Name
E-Mail
Comments

Back to Top