Conflict between Science and Religion lies in our brain
by Jayasree Saranathan on 10 Oct 2021 8 Comments

But not necessarily for a follower of Hindu Thought

 

Scientific studies done until now had shown that analytical thinking always discourages belief in God. As per this a scientist cannot be expected to be a believer of God whereas the available data shows that nearly 90% of the Nobel laureates had faith in God. It has always been believed or rather hypothesised that the brain has two conflicting centres of function, one that does analytical thinking and the other that makes one religious.

 

In this background the study by researchers of Case Western Reserve University and Babson College had shown a marginally different result. This study shows that analytical thinking does not give rise to disbelief in God. On the contrary it was found that those who exhibited empathy happened to be more religious or spiritual. This means that one can be analytical and at the same time empathic and therefore spiritual. In other words there is no tension or conflict between those regions of the brain that support analytical ability and belief in God.

 

The confusion was due to the existent belief to some extent in the western countries and in agnostic and atheistic societies that religion and religious beliefs are absurd and unscientific. But coming from the background of Vedanta that forms the basis of Hinduism, we have no confusion between analytical approach and religious thoughts, for Hinduism is based on logical concept of God and evolution of man to Godhood. The basic tenet is compassion which is signified as Sattwic Guna which is what the Almighty is personified as. The basic approach is analytical or what is known as inquiry into the nature of both material world (prakruthi) and consciousness (Purusha or the Individual self and the Universal Self known as God). So this requires the use of both parts of the brain that the researchers have subjected to analysis.

 

A nutshell of what this Vedantic religion requires us to do has been given in the 1st verse of “Vedartha Sangraha” – a collection of Vedic thought given as lectures by Acharya Ramanuja in front of Lord Venkateswara in Thirumala. It runs as follows:

 

The individual self is subject to beginning-less nesceince, which has brought about an accumulation of karma, of the nature of both merit and demerit. The flood of such karma causes his entry into four kinds of bodies – heavenly, human, animal and plant beginning with that of Brahma downwards. This ingression into bodies produces the delusion of identity with those respective bodies (and the consequent attachments and aversions). This delusion inevitably brings about all the fears inherent in the state of worldly existence. The entire body of Vedanta aims at the annihilation of these fears.

 

“To accomplish their annihilation, they teach the following:

(1) The essential nature of the individual self as the transcending body.

(2) The attributes of the individual self.

(3) The essential nature of the Supreme that is the inmost controller of both the material universe and the individual selves.

(4) The attributes of the Supreme.

(5) The devout meditation upon the Supreme.

(6) The goal to which such meditation leads.

 

“Vedanta aims at making known the goal attainable through such a life of meditation, the goal being the realisation of the real nature of the individual self and after and through that realisation, the direct experience of the Brahman, which is the nature of bliss infinite and perfect.”

 

The conviction about these views and the practice of the same require a logical and analytical mind tinged with sattwic attitude of which compassion and empathy are supreme attributes. When one is tuned with compassion and empathy, one is indeed Godly at that moment.

 

Rama, the most adored God of the Hindus, had once expressed to Sita that compassion was his supreme Dharma.

Sita expressed this to Hanuman in Ashoka Vana (VR: 5-38-41)

“You yourself (Rama) told me (Sita) that kindness is the best Dharma”.

The part of the brain that induces one to be kind to others cannot run repellent to analytical thinking.

 

I wish these researchers take practicing Hindus for their study!

 

https://jayasreesaranathan.blogspot.com/2016/03/conflict-between-science-and-religion.html?m=1&s=03

User Comments Post a Comment
Looking forward to a further analysis of this interesting topic.
Dr. Vijaya Rajiva
October 10, 2021
Report Abuse
The author has given much food for thought. Has made a good attempt to highlight the role of vedanta. Unlike other religions , vedanta blends rationality and faith in a harmonious way , making a person ,a wholesome personality.

In my college days, I used to approach two of my maternal uncles to solve problems of mathematics. Both these uncles were civil engineers. One of them could solve the maths problem but could not explain it to me. The other uncle could analytically solve the problem and hence was adept at teaching me. Both uncles were very brilliant but their method of solving differed. One understood for himself the problem but was not good at teaching, and the other had a analytic brain , could not only understand but also tech students. This made me conclude that one of the uncles had a brain that is intuitive and the other has analytical brain. Their scientific attitude did not affect their religious views.
Panikkath Krishnanunni
October 10, 2021
Report Abuse
A typo error correction.
In second last sentence for tech read as teach students.
Panikkath Krishnanunni
October 10, 2021
Report Abuse
OR...

One could be a little less convenient-minded and conjecture a third position.

If life-forms anywhere and everywhere in the universe evolve, the question must be asked, in what direction are we all evolving? For what purpose? a valid question considering that the universe is intensely integral and directional, yet its purpose has been inadequately explained by those who fancy themselves as scientists, hence the illogical Big Bang (theory, yet globally accepted by other scientists).

I consider it more logical that life is that entity in this universe that will one day precipitate a connection with the multiverse, which is an evolutionary event on its own merit. Our technology is clearly pointing in this direction, rather destructively, in my opinion. This hypothesis also replaces the rather pointless theory of Big Bang.

That this evolution will presumably end humanity and, in fact, all life, seems inevitable, if not somewhat regrettable for we sentient beings.

So, rather than contemplate such an unsavoury end, we seek a more romantic destiny. If it makes you feel better, Jayasree, embrace your fairy tales and, salvage the rationale for your hierarchism which, I might add, was rejected forever by Balinese Hindus.

Thus they are still Hindus, albeit, nicer Hindus. They refused to be corrupted by hierarchism and untouchable castes and retained a more intellectual outlook.

i suggest you visit Bali and experience Hinduism in its more empathetic, compassionate and prohuman form. This is the reason that everybody who visits Bali, so love the people. And I regard love as the most powerful element of human existance.
Tony Ryan
October 10, 2021
Report Abuse
Respected Madam,

I am happy to read your article, and, what comes to my mind was an instance (about which I read while in Germany), when Albert Einstein, Niels Bohr, Sir Rutherford, and Heisenberg of the "Uncertainty Principle" fame , which had challenged Einstein's theory E = mc 2. This happened in Copenhagen and these scientists (all Physics Nobel Laureates) could not come to agreement, and, finally, an exasperated Einstein made the metaphoric statement "God does not play dice". It would be interesting for the readers to note that at the beginning of his scientific career, Einstein was a complete atheist, then turned to be an agnost, and, towards the end of his life become completely religious - a belief in a God, one does n't see.

May I take the liberty of saying I fully agree with the last part of what Tony has written, about love. I hope, true love.
Professor Kodoth Prabhakaran Nair
October 10, 2021
Report Abuse
Wonderful
Ajay
October 10, 2021
Report Abuse
I agree with Tony Ryan that love is an important factor.

However, his criticism of the article is somewhat one sided and shows a lack of knowledge of Vedanta.

Vedanta is not talking about caste oppression etc. which have evolved in daily Hinduism. The insight that Vedanta offers is :

Prajnanam Brahman
Tat tvam asi
ayam atma brahman
aham brahmasmi

None of these mahavakyas excludes love. In fact, they endorse the unity of Being.

Today's Hindu modern gurus, also endorse that approach. Sri Satya Sai Baba speaks about God (Brahman) being Love and that humans must love one another and all of creation.

Jaynathiji is talking about the false alleged conflict between the right brain and the left brain.

She is a true scholar and I hope she will continue to pursue the topic with the integrity and knowledge that she displayed in her historical studies.
Dr. Vijaya Rajiva
October 10, 2021
Report Abuse
Sorry, I meant Jayasree !
Dr. Vijaya Rajiva
October 10, 2021
Report Abuse